Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Moon? Mars? Forget About It!
MichNews.com ^ | 12/01/04 | Alan Cruba

Posted on 12/01/2004 4:42:44 PM PST by KevinDavis

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: Search4Truth

That might a good place to start. Why not robots that can build things?


21 posted on 12/01/2004 5:26:37 PM PST by MagnumRancid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Pelayo

While I would love to travel in space myself, I believe that the government is the fastest way to spend a huge amount of money and get very little for it. Private enterprise is the way to go.

The biggest problem with space travel is a propulsion system that needs hundreds of tons of extremely volatile fuel. Until we develope a propulsion system that can put a ship into space cheaply and safely, space travel is just too expensive and too dangerous.


22 posted on 12/01/2004 5:27:02 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (God is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #23 Removed by Moderator

To: KevinDavis
America is a nation founded on expansionism. We thrive on opening new frontiers. We stagnate without the ability to expand.

When the going gets tough the tough get going to where the going is easier.

I'd like to retire on the moon at 1/6 G. Inside a dome with some plastic wings you could fly like a bird.

24 posted on 12/01/2004 5:30:27 PM PST by WhirlwindAttack ( Hey man! I think i stepped in some shiite..Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Islam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MagnumRancid

Have to go with the profit potential if it is going to be a private enterprise. And the only thing I can think of is a virtual Mars trip created with HDTV robots. People will pay big bucks for that. Could be narrated in any language.


25 posted on 12/01/2004 5:33:11 PM PST by Search4Truth (When a man lies he murders some part of the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: WhirlwindAttack

Put a Chevy on mars, or a Sony TV. Or MTV. Let them pay for the ride.


26 posted on 12/01/2004 5:34:44 PM PST by JOE6PAK (...still crazy after all these BEERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Yeah, why send ships to this so-called "New World"? Man is not meant to travel across vast oceans and besides, the world is flat and you'll just fall off the edge when you get there.


27 posted on 12/01/2004 5:36:22 PM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Search4Truth

That's cool, but I want my own robot.


28 posted on 12/01/2004 5:38:44 PM PST by MagnumRancid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

You can go first!


29 posted on 12/01/2004 5:39:00 PM PST by Search4Truth (When a man lies he murders some part of the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Too bad he isn't around to slap some sense into todays democrats.

And I thought that Republicans control our government.

30 posted on 12/01/2004 5:39:55 PM PST by Doe Eyes (Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
Why didn’t we return to the Moon?

Because there wasn't any money in it. Or more precisely, no one was allowed to do it for a profit. When that changes the place will be crawling with people.

Good grief, the New World wasn't explored by people on NSF grants. It was explored by guys who wanted to get filthy rich, and so they did.

31 posted on 12/01/2004 5:42:22 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

You're absolutely correct. If G-d had wanted us to fly he would have given us wings, and if he wanted us to go into space he'd have give us....something.....maybe a brain to work it out......I don't know. I hope He let's me watch.


32 posted on 12/01/2004 5:43:40 PM PST by MagnumRancid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Great Prophet Zarquon; Blood of Tyrants
The biggest problem with space travel is a propulsion system that needs hundreds of tons of extremely volatile fuel. Until we develope a propulsion system that can put a ship into space cheaply and safely, space travel is just too expensive and too dangerous.>>>

It's called "nuclear power." Problem is that the nonukenazis will never permit it.

No. as the writer said, without realizing, for the Earth's steep gravity well, we need a trolley car.

33 posted on 12/01/2004 5:46:02 PM PST by Oztrich Boy ("Ain't I a stinker?" B Bunny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Great Prophet Zarquon
Most of the fuel and propulsion system are about getting away from the earth's gravity. Any large deep-space craft would need to be build and launched from orbit or possibly the moon.
34 posted on 12/01/2004 5:47:04 PM PST by MagnumRancid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
Why didn’t we return to the Moon?
Because b&w fuzzy images won't do the job now
35 posted on 12/01/2004 5:47:32 PM PST by Truth666 (http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Proof+that+at+least+one+of+two%22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
From 1911 through 1997, approximately 103,000 miners died at work. During 1911-1915, an average of 3329 mining-related deaths occurred per year among approximately 1 million miners employed annually, with an average annual fatality rate of 329 per 100,000 miners. In one incident alone On December 6, 1907, a coal mine explosion in Monongah, West Virginia, killed a reported 362 men and boys.
103,000 deaths did not stop us from pursuing coal mining. 14 deaths should not stop us from pursuing space exploration.
36 posted on 12/01/2004 5:53:32 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Search4Truth
They need to get some robotic HDTV cameras on Mars and make a feature presentation. They could do it for a fraction of the cost of sending humans and do it a decade sooner. That way everyone could take a virtual trip to Mars. IMAX could make a fortune. The profits on the distribution rights to the film could be, well, out of this world.

So go for it. What's stopping you?

37 posted on 12/01/2004 5:54:39 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls

Got a few million dollars you can spare. Ground floor opportunity, well kinda. :)


38 posted on 12/01/2004 5:56:39 PM PST by Search4Truth (When a man lies he murders some part of the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: tet68

Yup, you could free up plenty of $ by eliminating cash payments to welfare parasites. More than enough to get to Mars and back.


39 posted on 12/01/2004 5:57:36 PM PST by boop (Testing the tagline feature!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
The only thing he forgot was the following disclaimer.

*This ignorant rant was made possible by space technology spinoffs.

40 posted on 12/01/2004 5:58:03 PM PST by PeaceBeWithYou (De Oppresso Liber! (50 million and counting in Afganistan and Iraq))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson