Sure,
Boeing managed to bring out the F18 on time, the C17 was on time and is now UNDER original anticipated cost. Both had larger issues this far out before production. Flying prototypes of the F35 flew a long time ago. We still have YEARS before initial operational dates arrive (The P51 went from blue print to production in 6 months). The F35 has borrowed technology from its bigger brother the F22. Not everything is like reinventing the wheel. Ejection seat already exists. A lot of design is lifted from the F22 or is off the shelf some other way.
Actually yes. I don't see the F35 really having any big issues. The story that sells is "controversial" and "uncovers" some "scandal". However, the firms working on the F35 and F22 have more experience and know-how than nearly any one out there. I don't even see myself as being an optimist when I say that the F35 will go operational on time unless monies are diverted because of other pressing issues (Iraq, Afghanistan GWT so on) or if the political climate somehow dramatically changes.
The concept of the F35 and F22 working together like the F16 and F15 did, sounds very good to me. Both are true 5th generation aircraft with much more growth potential than current airframes. The F35 will provide the sufficient volume in aircraft while the F22 will be the 300 pound gorilla in limited qualities since they’re cost prohibitive. But not all missions require the ability of a F22 and this machine while necessary is not required even in large volumes. In support of maneuver in the CAS role the JSF/F35 will do just fine. If I see it right, I think this will be a good concept as it was in the past.
Red6
I was going to stop reading right there, but I decided to add that I probably should not be commenting on this subject, because I really don't know crap about it. Someday, I am going to learn to keep my comments about fighter aircraft to myself, and just defer to those more knowledgeable than myself in this area.
LC, do you think this wise?