Skip to comments.
Should The F-22 be cancelled?
26-nov,2004
| Me
Posted on 11/25/2004 6:44:38 PM PST by Haro_546
Yes. This type of aircraft has no place in the modern battlefield and Foreseeable conflicts. The money could be put into more usefull sistems (each unit cost about $235 million for 239 planes) Whats your opinion?
TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: airforce; duersdrool; f22; foxmuldermark; freepersrule; imaduer; kerrylover; tinfoilhatter; troll; ufo; xfiles; yes; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280, 281-300, 301-320 ... 621-636 next last
To: Quix
Its a conservative paradigm
281
posted on
11/25/2004 8:37:35 PM PST
by
Haro_546
(Christian Zionist)
To: Haro_546
And your solution ,for Air Superiority Aircraft to counter the new designs out of China and Russia, is...?
282
posted on
11/25/2004 8:38:10 PM PST
by
vannrox
(The Preamble to the Bill of Rights - without it, our Bill of Rights is meaningless!)
To: Haro_546
We need more of these planes with bunny hand-pats.
How I used to love air travel!
To: Cyclone59
Sounds like a knowing assertion, to me.
284
posted on
11/25/2004 8:39:28 PM PST
by
Quix
(5having a form of godliness but denying its power. I TIM 3:5)
To: notorious vrc
I may be mistaken. I was 11B. The only aircraft I got to ride in were the ones that the ride ended in mid flight.
285
posted on
11/25/2004 8:39:40 PM PST
by
airborne
(God bless and keep our fallen heroes.)
To: Major_Risktaker
286
posted on
11/25/2004 8:40:13 PM PST
by
Haro_546
(Christian Zionist)
To: Quix
Well since the Puppet Master is the one running things and the Puppet Master is the one attacking us, then it would probably be the Puppet Master's decision to defend ourselves against himself. And since Puppet Master probably won't attack Puppet Master... hmmm...
Is this Puppet Master guy kind of like the Man?
I know just who to send in to stop him...
287
posted on
11/25/2004 8:40:26 PM PST
by
streetpreacher
(There will be no Trolls in heaven.)
Comment #288 Removed by Moderator
To: vannrox
Our current forces can blow them out of the sky.
289
posted on
11/25/2004 8:41:19 PM PST
by
Haro_546
(Christian Zionist)
To: mad_as_he$$
I think the mindset-arrogance is part and parcel of the same idiocy. . . along with turf fights to the hurt of our Republic. Such nonsense is probably more deadly to our Republic than 50 weapons sytems of our enemies.
290
posted on
11/25/2004 8:42:15 PM PST
by
Quix
(5having a form of godliness but denying its power. I TIM 3:5)
To: Haro_546
Cancel it and give all the money to me.
291
posted on
11/25/2004 8:43:19 PM PST
by
STAmarine
(STAmarine)
To: JRandomFreeper
I don't still don't understand why so many are saying he is Chinese? Did I overlook that post?
292
posted on
11/25/2004 8:43:25 PM PST
by
streetpreacher
(There will be no Trolls in heaven.)
To: BIGLOOK
Selbsverstandlich, entschuldigung.You don't need to apologize to me. If you want to apologize to him, I was thinking Chinese might be more appropriate than German.
293
posted on
11/25/2004 8:43:46 PM PST
by
PAR35
To: BIGLOOK
If the F22 flies rings around everything else,
then our much better platforms fly what . . .
multidimensional spheres around everything else?
LOL.
294
posted on
11/25/2004 8:44:41 PM PST
by
Quix
(5having a form of godliness but denying its power. I TIM 3:5)
To: streetpreacher
There is a common misconception that is held by the majority of liberal Americans...
That is that all future wars will be of a terrorist or gorella warfare nature. It is possibly the case, but I doubt it. Actually, we still need to project our forces in such a manner as to defend from ALL types of military threats. Not just simply from lightly armed terrorist cells.
It is critical that our weapons systmes be of top quality and technologically advanced, or barring that, be such that monetary contracts are delivered to companies to retain the technical help necessary to build such systems.
If the F-22 is not technologically advanced enough to meet projected agressive conflict, then I must counter that the contrats are in place to retain the technical know-how and skill levels of the engineers who will design the weapons systems of the future.
295
posted on
11/25/2004 8:45:12 PM PST
by
vannrox
(The Preamble to the Bill of Rights - without it, our Bill of Rights is meaningless!)
To: STAmarine
296
posted on
11/25/2004 8:45:23 PM PST
by
Haro_546
(Christian Zionist)
To: mad_as_he$$
How 'bout just pure govmint bureaucracy?
297
posted on
11/25/2004 8:45:42 PM PST
by
streetpreacher
(There will be no Trolls in heaven.)
To: deport
Some moderate puzzle pieces suggest the Chinese are angling for war with Taiwan and USA around 2006.
298
posted on
11/25/2004 8:46:22 PM PST
by
Quix
(5having a form of godliness but denying its power. I TIM 3:5)
To: vannrox
Its a Don Quixote project.
299
posted on
11/25/2004 8:47:13 PM PST
by
Haro_546
(Christian Zionist)
To: STAmarine
Cancel it and give all the money to me.Spoken like a true Democrat.
300
posted on
11/25/2004 8:47:39 PM PST
by
streetpreacher
(There will be no Trolls in heaven.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280, 281-300, 301-320 ... 621-636 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson