Let's review some basics.
Nov 10: Official results of the first round show Yushchenko on 39.87 percent of the vote, narrowly ahead of Yanukovich on 39.32 percent.
A concerted and forceful program of electoral fraud and abuse was enacted with either the leadership or cooperation of Ukrainian governmental authorities," Senator Lugar reported. (This is a US Senator)
Kiev city council refuses to recognise the results and calls on parliament not to approve it. (Kyiv is the just the capital you know.)
OSCE observers say the vote was not democratic,
Four high ranking diplomats from the Ukrainian embassy in DC said voters were subjected to incessant threats, terror and massive fraud.
No one but no one, outside of of meddling Russia, views Yanukovych as the legitimate president of Ykraiha.
And as far as the eastern part - Have you ever looked at pictures of Luhansk? Good grief - it's butt ugly. They'll just have to take a midol and get over losing an election.
So where are the people in support of Yanukovych? What no massive demonstration of support in lovey dowtown Luhansk? There wouldn't be any in Kherson (you know in southern Ukr) because they didn't vote unanimiously for Yanukovych.
Absolutely, and by that logic, Gore should have been in the White House, after all all the EUers agreed with it. And they are still recounting to find that Bush "lost". Give them time, the techniques of Soros and company are well honed. Or did you not know that the West's candidate is a Soros man through and through. Guess raping Georgia wasn't enough to sait his appitite this year.
They did not say it. That said that was not up to the EU standards. They said the same thing about 2000 and 2004 US elections.