Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FairOpinion

I personally think they could be thinking on the line "You are in my country, Bush, and under our laws we are authorized toprotect you and not the US bodyguards.". This involves sovereignty and jurisdiction.


522 posted on 11/20/2004 7:19:46 PM PST by NZerFromHK (Disclaimer: this poster is a naturalized NZer born in Hong Kong, not a expat Kiwi in HK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 513 | View Replies ]


To: NZerFromHK

It doesn't work that way. The personal protection of the president is never left to others. The Chileans certainly have the responsibility for security, but they have no right to restrict Bush's Secret Service protection.

I think some Chilean SS were "unclear on the concept".


532 posted on 11/20/2004 7:23:04 PM PST by FairOpinion (Thank you Swifties, POWs & Vets. We couldn't have done it without you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 522 | View Replies ]

To: NZerFromHK
Sorry but you are wrong. The President is a SOVERIEGN and is NOT subject to foreign national "protection".
534 posted on 11/20/2004 7:23:55 PM PST by Texasforever (I need a new tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 522 | View Replies ]

To: NZerFromHK

I personally think they could be thinking on the line "You are in my country, Bush, and under our laws we are authorized toprotect you and not the US bodyguards.". This involves sovereignty and jurisdiction.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

I don't know about you but I'm thinking this is the POTUS and your Country needs to show him proper respect or else. That's what I would think.


633 posted on 11/20/2004 8:10:55 PM PST by politicalmerc (Kerry/Edwards rejected not elected http://www.tdowc.com/store/catalog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 522 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson