Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blakep

Exactly.

I don't like Specter at all; but the important thing is that he has never participated in a filibuster, and has outright condemned them. He is of the opinion that "if you don't like the judge, vote him down. But you have to give him his vote." My quote, not his.

We have the numbers to get any judge confirmed. If Specter continues to hold the same positions he's always held, the judges will come to the floor for a vote and will get confirmed 53-47(ish). That's the most important thing here -- that he won't filibuster. He may vote against a judge, but we'll still have the numbers; and he'd do that anyway if he's wasn't the Chairman.

Just get these judges to the floor for a vote, then they're in!


14 posted on 11/18/2004 4:12:21 PM PST by TitansAFC (Al Gonzales for SCOTUS? Let's just nominate Arlen Specter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: TitansAFC
I don't give a rat's toenail that Specter didn't filibuster any of Bush's nominees. The question is whether Arlen is going to aggressively champion those nominees.

I love Bush and Karl, but if they or the GOP leadership betray the pro-life folks that put them in power, they are gonna go down big time. And I will assure that the Almighty is not indifferent on the subject.

63 posted on 11/18/2004 5:51:13 PM PST by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson