I agree that the ICC is very much in limbo. Even when it settles down, it can dictate it's own course at will. Nobody can vote to abolish it. Nobody can vote to alter it's course. Nobody can vote to remove one member, sensure them or basicily do anything that can realisticly modify the court's actions.
We are at it's mercy. Why is that such a hard concept for folks to understand? If they do disagree, I at the very minimum would like them to tell me what method there is to keep it under control. This will be a good exercise for them, because there isn't any.
It's amazing to me how people never learn from history.