Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EveningStar

Not racist. Well within the bounds of LONG historical precedent of editorial cartoon.


116 posted on 11/17/2004 10:07:30 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: bvw
Well within the bounds of LONG historical precedent of editorial cartoon.

Maybe you should do some research on the "LONG historical precedent of editorial cartoons" -- you'll discover that it's not necessarily a very honorable history. Look at those of the 1800's and early 1900's. If you're going to cite the "LONG" precedent, then examine the "LONG" precedent.
120 posted on 11/17/2004 10:10:17 AM PST by hinterlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

To: bvw
"Well within the bounds of LONG historical precedent of editorial cartoon"

I'd like to see how a MLK or Malcolm X cartoon with giant protruding lips would go over today.

123 posted on 11/17/2004 10:11:30 AM PST by proust
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

To: bvw
Not racist. Well within the bounds of LONG historical precedent of editorial cartoon.

I mostly agree with you. I think what people are upset about is the depiction of Condi having, stereotypically black, large lips. In fact, she does not have large lips at all.

That feature was unnecessary. The rest of it is fine with me. I see no sexism at all and I think the complaints about the dialogue are reaching.

126 posted on 11/17/2004 10:12:10 AM PST by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson