Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA Launches Unmanned Hypersonic Jet
AP News ^ | November 16, 2004 | AP

Posted on 11/16/2004 3:28:29 PM PST by O.C. - Old Cracker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last
To: MeanWestTexan
Mach 9; Shmock 9. What did the stewardesses look like?

Teeny tiny! :-) LOL!

21 posted on 11/16/2004 3:57:38 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: O.C. - Old Cracker
How 'bout one of these babies parked in your garage!


22 posted on 11/16/2004 3:58:40 PM PST by GalaxieFiveHundred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: O.C. - Old Cracker; Tijeras_Slim; FireTrack; Pukin Dog; citabria; B Knotts; kilowhskey; ...

23 posted on 11/16/2004 3:59:22 PM PST by Aeronaut (This is no ordinary time. And George W. Bush is no ordinary leader." --George Pataki)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: milestogo
"These developments will also help us advance the Vision for Space Exploration, while helping to advance commercial aviation technology," Administrator O'Keefe said.

When the history of the Bush 43 presidency is written, this will be yet another superlative legacy of his.

24 posted on 11/16/2004 4:00:24 PM PST by Wolfstar (Counting down the days to when the new White House puppy arrives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dasboot

Yeah. It's about the size of the B52's landing gear.


25 posted on 11/16/2004 4:04:14 PM PST by Lexinom (ANYBODY BUT ARLEN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: O.C. - Old Cracker

I am not sure this is true.

Russia has been screwing around with scramjet technology.

They have used the scramjet on a TOPOL (SS-25). Although this is a missile, the stubby wings of the X-43 versus the SS-25 is not a big difference.

If they are saying the X-43 is an aircraft and they do not count the TOPOL/scramjet as an aircraft, they might be technically correct.

But the fact is that Russia may actually hold the record for scramjet speed.


26 posted on 11/16/2004 4:06:30 PM PST by Dont_Tread_On_Me_888 (John Kerry--three fake Purple Hearts. George Bush--one real heart of gold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dasboot
I think this is the technology that will allow us to deliver payloads of nastiness 1/3 the way around the globe on two hours' notice; and upgrade anti-missile defenses.

Yup lots of potential here!

27 posted on 11/16/2004 4:06:36 PM PST by mylife (The roar of the masses could be farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar
These developments will also help us advance the Vision for Space Exploration,

Yup. Pushing the envelope of the "Vision Thing" by a craft with no windows, no less!

28 posted on 11/16/2004 4:07:02 PM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: O.C. - Old Cracker

Anybody got stats on how far down-range it went?


29 posted on 11/16/2004 4:07:53 PM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: O.C. - Old Cracker

Hasn't Aurora been exceeding this for years previous? Isn't NASA in the Area 51 loop? Will NASA license this engine to Burt Rutan?


30 posted on 11/16/2004 4:11:21 PM PST by mission9 (Be a Citizen worth dying for in a Nation worth living for!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: O.C. - Old Cracker
Mach 10 Flight is Next

The last X-43A vehicle has additional thermal protection for the Mach 10 flight, since it will experience heating roughly twice that of the Mach 7 vehicle. Reinforced carbon-carbon composite material has been added to the leading edges of the vehicle's vertical fins to handle the higher temperatures. For the Mach 10 flight, which equates to approximately 7,000 mph, the booster rocket will launch the X-43A to 110,000 feet before it separates and the X-43A operates its scramjet. The research vehicle will travel about 850 miles before splashing into the ocean. As with the previous X-43A vehicles, it will not be recovered.

2001 Flight and Investigation

The first X-43A flight attempt was in June 2001. Unfortunately, the booster failed and had to be destroyed early in flight. As a result, the research vehicle was not tested because it never reached test conditions. Although no single contributing factor was found, the root cause of the problem was identified as the booster's flight control system. The booster failed due to inaccurate design models that overestimated the capability of the flight control system to operate within predicted flight conditions.

31 posted on 11/16/2004 4:13:41 PM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: O.C. - Old Cracker
You can't read, can you?

Psst... It was a joke.


32 posted on 11/16/2004 4:15:51 PM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: O.C. - Old Cracker

33 posted on 11/16/2004 4:17:13 PM PST by petercooper (Kerry voters -- How can 57,166,951 people be so DUMB?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun

Besides the obvious scientific uses for this machine...

Picture if you will, say several thousand pounds of some really nasty stuff packed into the nose of that puppy... launched unmanned from Vandenberg, and flying at 15,000 miles per hour... and it is programmed by satellite to lay da "smackdown" on bin laden! Nose camera delivers "realtime" video evidence.

Money damn well spent!

LLS


34 posted on 11/16/2004 4:19:02 PM PST by LibLieSlayer (November 2, 2004... the most beautiful day of this YEAR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
But the fact is that Russia may actually hold the record for scramjet speed.

?......is this just really another Russian piece of work?

35 posted on 11/16/2004 4:21:27 PM PST by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: O.C. - Old Cracker
The craft was designed to sink and will not be recovered.

Sure,.....

36 posted on 11/16/2004 4:23:10 PM PST by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Viking2002
I can go along with that...with it's own battle music!
37 posted on 11/16/2004 4:23:55 PM PST by Issaquahking ( Bush won, Arafat is dead! Life is good!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Issaquahking
Bet it wouldn't surprise you to know that I'm a big Zep fan from way back, would it? :-)


38 posted on 11/16/2004 4:26:37 PM PST by Viking2002 (Taglines? Vikings don't need no steenkin' taglines..............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: maestro
"The craft was designed to sink and will not be recovered. "

OOPS!

39 posted on 11/16/2004 4:27:58 PM PST by Rebelbase (Indiscriminate reprisals strengthen the terrorists. Targeted ones weaken them. Aim is everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; Brett66; xrp; gdc314; sionnsar; anymouse; RadioAstronomer; NonZeroSum; jimkress; ...

40 posted on 11/16/2004 4:33:16 PM PST by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson