Skip to comments.
NASA Launches Unmanned Hypersonic Jet
AP News ^
| November 16, 2004
| AP
Posted on 11/16/2004 3:28:29 PM PST by O.C. - Old Cracker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-115 next last
To: MeanWestTexan
Mach 9; Shmock 9. What did the stewardesses look like?Teeny tiny! :-) LOL!
To: O.C. - Old Cracker
How 'bout one of these babies parked in your garage!
To: O.C. - Old Cracker; Tijeras_Slim; FireTrack; Pukin Dog; citabria; B Knotts; kilowhskey; ...
23
posted on
11/16/2004 3:59:22 PM PST
by
Aeronaut
(This is no ordinary time. And George W. Bush is no ordinary leader." --George Pataki)
To: milestogo
"These developments will also help us advance the Vision for Space Exploration, while helping to advance commercial aviation technology," Administrator O'Keefe said.When the history of the Bush 43 presidency is written, this will be yet another superlative legacy of his.
24
posted on
11/16/2004 4:00:24 PM PST
by
Wolfstar
(Counting down the days to when the new White House puppy arrives.)
To: dasboot
Yeah. It's about the size of the B52's landing gear.
25
posted on
11/16/2004 4:04:14 PM PST
by
Lexinom
(ANYBODY BUT ARLEN)
To: O.C. - Old Cracker
I am not sure this is true.
Russia has been screwing around with scramjet technology.
They have used the scramjet on a TOPOL (SS-25). Although this is a missile, the stubby wings of the X-43 versus the SS-25 is not a big difference.
If they are saying the X-43 is an aircraft and they do not count the TOPOL/scramjet as an aircraft, they might be technically correct.
But the fact is that Russia may actually hold the record for scramjet speed.
26
posted on
11/16/2004 4:06:30 PM PST
by
Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
(John Kerry--three fake Purple Hearts. George Bush--one real heart of gold.)
To: dasboot
I think this is the technology that will allow us to deliver payloads of nastiness 1/3 the way around the globe on two hours' notice; and upgrade anti-missile defenses. Yup lots of potential here!
27
posted on
11/16/2004 4:06:36 PM PST
by
mylife
(The roar of the masses could be farts)
To: Wolfstar
These developments will also help us advance the Vision for Space Exploration, Yup. Pushing the envelope of the "Vision Thing" by a craft with no windows, no less!
28
posted on
11/16/2004 4:07:02 PM PST
by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
To: O.C. - Old Cracker
Anybody got stats on how far down-range it went?
29
posted on
11/16/2004 4:07:53 PM PST
by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
To: O.C. - Old Cracker
Hasn't Aurora been exceeding this for years previous? Isn't NASA in the Area 51 loop? Will NASA license this engine to Burt Rutan?
30
posted on
11/16/2004 4:11:21 PM PST
by
mission9
(Be a Citizen worth dying for in a Nation worth living for!)
To: O.C. - Old Cracker
Mach 10 Flight is Next The last X-43A vehicle has additional thermal protection for the Mach 10 flight, since it will experience heating roughly twice that of the Mach 7 vehicle. Reinforced carbon-carbon composite material has been added to the leading edges of the vehicle's vertical fins to handle the higher temperatures. For the Mach 10 flight, which equates to approximately 7,000 mph, the booster rocket will launch the X-43A to 110,000 feet before it separates and the X-43A operates its scramjet. The research vehicle will travel about 850 miles before splashing into the ocean. As with the previous X-43A vehicles, it will not be recovered.
2001 Flight and Investigation
The first X-43A flight attempt was in June 2001. Unfortunately, the booster failed and had to be destroyed early in flight. As a result, the research vehicle was not tested because it never reached test conditions. Although no single contributing factor was found, the root cause of the problem was identified as the booster's flight control system. The booster failed due to inaccurate design models that overestimated the capability of the flight control system to operate within predicted flight conditions.
31
posted on
11/16/2004 4:13:41 PM PST
by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
To: O.C. - Old Cracker
You can't read, can you? Psst... It was a joke.
To: O.C. - Old Cracker
33
posted on
11/16/2004 4:17:13 PM PST
by
petercooper
(Kerry voters -- How can 57,166,951 people be so DUMB?)
To: Jaysun
Besides the obvious scientific uses for this machine...
Picture if you will, say several thousand pounds of some really nasty stuff packed into the nose of that puppy... launched unmanned from Vandenberg, and flying at 15,000 miles per hour... and it is programmed by satellite to lay da "smackdown" on bin laden! Nose camera delivers "realtime" video evidence.
Money damn well spent!
LLS
34
posted on
11/16/2004 4:19:02 PM PST
by
LibLieSlayer
(November 2, 2004... the most beautiful day of this YEAR!)
To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
But the fact is that Russia may actually hold the record for scramjet speed.
?......is this just really another Russian piece of work?
35
posted on
11/16/2004 4:21:27 PM PST
by
maestro
To: O.C. - Old Cracker
The craft was designed to sink and will not be recovered.
Sure,.....
36
posted on
11/16/2004 4:23:10 PM PST
by
maestro
To: Viking2002
I can go along with that...with it's own battle
music!
37
posted on
11/16/2004 4:23:55 PM PST
by
Issaquahking
( Bush won, Arafat is dead! Life is good!)
To: Issaquahking
Bet it wouldn't surprise you to know that I'm a big Zep fan from way back, would it? :-)
38
posted on
11/16/2004 4:26:37 PM PST
by
Viking2002
(Taglines? Vikings don't need no steenkin' taglines..............)
To: maestro
"The craft was designed to sink and will not be recovered. "
OOPS!
39
posted on
11/16/2004 4:27:58 PM PST
by
Rebelbase
(Indiscriminate reprisals strengthen the terrorists. Targeted ones weaken them. Aim is everything.)
To: RightWhale; Brett66; xrp; gdc314; sionnsar; anymouse; RadioAstronomer; NonZeroSum; jimkress; ...
40
posted on
11/16/2004 4:33:16 PM PST
by
KevinDavis
(Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-115 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson