Skip to comments.
"Red states" that supported President Bush also supported slavery
News Target ^
| November 15, 2004
Posted on 11/15/2004 11:19:28 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-146 next last
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
alaska supported slavery?
2
posted on
11/15/2004 11:20:24 AM PST
by
camle
(keep your mind open and somebody will fill it with something for you))
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"Red states" that supported President Bush also supported slavery" Ahhhh that was WAY before my time.
3
posted on
11/15/2004 11:21:24 AM PST
by
SheLion
(President Bush received MORE votes ever in the period of History. The Rats need to get over it.)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Senator Robert Byrd (D) = KKK Grand Wizard
4
posted on
11/15/2004 11:21:52 AM PST
by
kx9088
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
5
posted on
11/15/2004 11:23:10 AM PST
by
brewcrew
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
An idiotic argument where liberal excel.
6
posted on
11/15/2004 11:23:14 AM PST
by
demlosers
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
There were slaves all through the north too...
7
posted on
11/15/2004 11:23:19 AM PST
by
2banana
(They want to die for Islam and we want to kill them)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Arizona is a red state. We weren't even in the Union until 1912. I don't believe we supported slavery. And Utah. I know they didn't have slaves over there. But, what do I know. I'm not elite enough.
8
posted on
11/15/2004 11:23:25 AM PST
by
HungarianGypsy
(We are the pirates who don't do anything....)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Does that include Iowa, Ohio, Indiana, West Virginia, and the litany of Western states that were still territories?
9
posted on
11/15/2004 11:23:32 AM PST
by
RWR8189
(Its Morning in America Again!)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"Red states" that supported President Bush also supported slavery
In that case, it's time to coin a new phrase: "Bush Democrats."
10
posted on
11/15/2004 11:23:47 AM PST
by
counterpunch
(The CouNTeRPuNcH Collection - www.counterpunch.us)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
That's really gimped logic by the rats. Democrats were (and are) the slavers. Republicans were the abolishionist party.
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Lincoln was a Republican... 'nuff said.
12
posted on
11/15/2004 11:24:01 AM PST
by
fr11
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"Red states" that supported President Bush also supported slavery Yep, and they were run by Democrats at the time, correct?
13
posted on
11/15/2004 11:24:35 AM PST
by
Ken H
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I'd read the article, but I'm too busy whipping hugging my ... erm... adopted children.
14
posted on
11/15/2004 11:24:41 AM PST
by
Nataku X
(Lord, please guide President Bush, and please protect our soldiers in Fallujah.)
To: camle
Iowa, Indiana and Ohio were the Union states that went for Dubya.
Slaves states that went for Kerry were Md. and Del. although both supported the Union (Md. only because Lincoln took put pro-union people in the state government.)
15
posted on
11/15/2004 11:25:00 AM PST
by
Tribune7
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
That was back when they were
Democrats
16
posted on
11/15/2004 11:25:02 AM PST
by
OSHA
(Anything not forbidden is mandatory.)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Who wrote this? Carol Simpson?
17
posted on
11/15/2004 11:25:04 AM PST
by
mewzilla
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I was wondering why I supported President Bush, and suddenly realized it is because I am an ignorant, racist redneck... Apparently I'm real stupid, too... And I wanna own slaves...
Yeah, I'm warming up to those Democrats...
18
posted on
11/15/2004 11:25:44 AM PST
by
gridlock
(ELIMINATE PERVERSE INCENTIVES)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I hope that the idiot who came up with this has some Icy Hot handy. They're going to need it when they finish stretching.
19
posted on
11/15/2004 11:26:14 AM PST
by
SilentServiceCPOWife
(In the smiling twilight of the new political morning, the unwashed told their betters to shove it.)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Massachusetts was the first state to embrace slavery in the new World. They sold the Native Americans to the slave traders that took them to Jamaica where they were sold to other slavers. Massachusetts was supportive of slavery for a long time because it supported their shipping interests. So, where is the logic and premise of this article?
20
posted on
11/15/2004 11:26:27 AM PST
by
vetvetdoug
(In memory of T/Sgt. Secundino "Dean" Baldonado, Jarales, NM-KIA Bien Hoa AFB, RVN 1965)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-146 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson