Replies

No offense, but abortion is not the same as gulags, extermination camps, et al.

You're right. It is far worse. A child in the womb can't defend himself in any way. He relies upon your humanity to protect him.

ACtually it's not.

I can only conclude that you agree with murdering abortionists and blowing up clinics--and how do I come to this conclusion? Easy. You actually say gulags and extermination camps are not as bad a thing as abortion(patently silly, but let's go with it) and I know that any of us would feel empowered to stop an extermination camp where Jews or anyone else was being liquidated and we'd kill the death camp guards and whoever was doing the killing, right?

So you approve of killing abortionists, you'd HAVE TO.

BTW, only a dunce would ever assert that most women who got abortions would kill a live baby(and most wouldn't abort a late-term) Yet you refuse to see that people perceive a difference between the unborn and born, whether you are moral in your approach it is a far different issue than Death camps, and you KNOW THAT.

Stop making pretend it's anything like gulags, because it isn't. If it were, people would at least FEEL that way about it(even if they felt powerless to act), but they don't.

Here's the rule: you were allowed to draw breath, it therefore is incumbent upon you to protect all those about near or about to do the same. An embryo is an embryo when he or she doesn't want it, as soon he or she does, that embryo is immediately transformed into a baby. How do you like that for Utilitarianism?

There is something particulary loathesome about people who instead of arging that abortion might be, sometimes, a necessary evil, argue that it is evidently, plainly nothing at all. Those people help pave the road to hell, IMO. If you don't have the right to life, what else is there?