Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: narses
Approve the pro-life judges, and there will be no problem. Vicomte13

Not if those new judges honored their oaths to support the Constitution.
"Due process" is a well established Constitutional right. It even applies to pregnant women, believe it or not.

Abortion is due process? Read your own tag-line. 374 narses

How dense can you get kid? -- States that decree early term abortion to be murder violate due process for the women so accused.
And when you insist that you have a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of that woman, Jefferson frowns.

But killing the BABY, that is OK?

No one can argue against your outbursts of irrational emotion, kiddo. Keep it up, and you'll get the thread killed.
Is that what you want?

Wow, it is clear you aren't Catholic. Atheist like your namesake?

I was confirmed Catholic, but soon realized that I didn't know it all. I'm agnostic, and you're getting personally offensive.

Take such BS to the backroom.

474 posted on 11/13/2004 11:20:35 AM PST by tpaine (No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another. - T. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies ]


To: tpaine

WADR, you're due process argument is about the most idiotic position I've seen in the whole 'debate'...

It's like you're carrying a hole around that has a bucket...


483 posted on 11/13/2004 11:24:53 AM PST by ApesForEvolution ("We trust [RINO-BORKING-ABORTER] Sen. Arlen spRectum's word" - "IF spRectum gets the Chair, IF")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 474 | View Replies ]

To: tpaine

It's not a government issues...it's not a legal issue....it's a sanctity of life issue that has to be decided by the individual.

Society doesn't live with the shame of legal abortion--the individual lives with the choice of having an abortion at all. Denying women the right to choose, won't prevent them from choosing to have abortions.

The RRs can win the argument against, without making abortions illegal. They just don't seem to understand that.

The faux-power the RR (and faux rr) thinks it has suddenly gained, is absurd. The numbers show that they did not contribute any more to GW's reelection this time, than they did last time. I suspect they never did help my side. They've been thorns in my side's side, for years. This is a perfect example of how.

ps: Hi!


493 posted on 11/13/2004 11:31:25 AM PST by unsycophant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 474 | View Replies ]

To: tpaine

"I was confirmed Catholic, but soon realized that I didn't know it all. I'm agnostic, and you're getting personally offensive."

How is a civil inquiry "getting personally offensive"?


581 posted on 11/13/2004 1:06:47 PM PST by narses (The fight to protect the unborn is THE civil rights battle of the 21st century. + Vivo Christo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 474 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson