"The military's purpose, as Rush likes to say, is to kill people and break things. We do so in defense of the Constitution, not individuals. But thanks for playing."
And you claim that keeping abortion on demand legal is "in defense of the Constitution, not individuals", right? So killing babies to protect the Constitution, you can live with that? 4,000 dead babies TODAY. You can live with that, right?
As it is currently interpreted, yes. The SCOTUS has that responsibility, and excercised it. You just disagree with the outcome, so you have whined about it for 30-odd years. Ergo, my statement that you too would like activist judges, so long as they are on YOUR side.
"So killing babies to protect the Constitution, you can live with that? 4,000 dead babies TODAY. You can live with that, right?"
First, you and the other zealots wave around figures like that constantly. Do you really believe anyone on either side hasn't heard them yet? And what effect have they had, other than to satisfy some urge you have to repeat them?
And second, once again, not everyone in the US considers all fertilized eggs to be "babies". This is obvious if your numbers are accurate. Might it be time to try another approach?