Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Luis Gonzalez
I said I would prefer an AG that was more obviously pro-life.

I didn't address the other issues.

Regarding a Supreme court justice, I will only support nominees who are wiling to overturn the unconstitutional decision of Roe vs. Wade. I fail to see how overturning an activst, uncontitutional decision, that should never have been made in the first place, is itself activist and unconstitutional. Sorry.

490 posted on 11/13/2004 6:41:36 AM PST by TAdams8591 (BORK SPECTER!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 489 | View Replies ]


To: TAdams8591

If you want an judge who would oveturn Roe v. Wade, then you want a judge who would rule in strict accordance to the self-evident wording of the law, in this case the Constitution. That's what Alberto Gonzales did in the Jane Doe cases...in spite of the fact that the ruling went against his personal convictions on the issue of abortion.

You would want Alberto Gonzales as a judge.


494 posted on 11/13/2004 7:36:05 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 490 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson