Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Axenolith; Preachin'
I read somewhere that he would not let them take a prelimanary vote to see where they were at.

Being a lawyer my guess is he was trying to retry the WHOLE case back in the jury room.

26 posted on 11/12/2004 7:38:09 AM PST by Spunky ("Everyone has a freedom of choice, but not of consequences.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Spunky

There must be a hell of a lot of unreleased evidence in that trial because I figured for sure they would aquit or hang. What do you think the appeals will hold with the late axing of jurors?


663 posted on 11/13/2004 6:04:03 PM PST by Axenolith (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson