[Modernman]

I am pretty sure that creationists would say that footprints in the snow are not made by chance and thus prove a foot was needed to make them.

Creationist logic would say that since we did not see the footprints being made, we cannot scientifically conclude that they were made by a person.

[jwalsh07]

Creationist logic would say that since we did not see the footprints being made, we cannot scientifically conclude that they were made by a person.

Which would be the correct conclusion to reach, logically.