Skip to comments.
AL QUAEDA SAYS HAS (AT LAST ONE) NUKE!
ADNKRONOS INTERNATIONAL ^
| 11/11/2004
| Traianus
Posted on 11/12/2004 2:46:55 AM PST by Traianus
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 last
To: Travis McGee
You'd never get back out, there's a giant mutant ant-lion in the bottom... it eats THEM. :)
81
posted on
11/12/2004 9:41:40 AM PST
by
Tijeras_Slim
(Of course a winning Powerball ticket wouldn't hurt.)
To: Travis McGee
And if you did survive the fall, you'd probably give yourself a wee dose, too.
82
posted on
11/12/2004 9:42:05 AM PST
by
Poohbah
(Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
Comment #83 Removed by Moderator
To: NetValue
What the allies did in WW2 was perfectly moral. The reason we won World War 2. We fought more brutally than they did. We bombed the Germans and Japanese into submission. You don't win wars by being less nasty than your enemy. IslamiNazis won't be defeated by showing them peace signs and handing them flowers.
84
posted on
11/12/2004 9:49:03 AM PST
by
Free ThinkerNY
((((Stamp out Liberalism))))
To: Traianus
85
posted on
11/12/2004 9:52:11 AM PST
by
tutstar
( <{{--->< http://ripe4change.4-all.org Violations of Florida Statutes ongoing!)
To: Traianus
Ok. And if one goes off, we have free rein. Release the hounds.
To: Traianus
"If allah had any true Godlike abilities"
We joke about nuking Mecca. It doesn't seem like the moral or American thing to do. But, I wonder if we should start considering what actually would deter the extreme Muslims.
They don't care about protecting their women or children, outfitting them with suicide bombs. I assume that the US military would wipe out all military installations in the anti-American Muslim world if we are nuked. But would even that demoralize them?
If we were to level Mecca that might get their attention. It would that prove that their god is false.
This article sounds like propaganda, and it is comforting to believe that al Qaeda isn't up to building a nuke. However, we discovered plans to build nukes on their computers captured in Afghanistan. They have lots of money and contacts with Iran, NK and Pakistan. When Libya gave up their WMDs, we discovered a large underground covert nuclear weapons supply network.
The Bush admin has been warning us that the goobers could one day nuke one of our cities. It isn't so far out there.
87
posted on
11/12/2004 9:46:04 PM PST
by
garjog
To: Free ThinkerNY
I agree. We bombed them into submission and invaded them and defeated them every way...militarily, industrially, politically, and morally too. My original point on this thread (lost and misunderstood long ago by those who cannot read well) was that you do not win by making terroristic THREATS to bomb RELIGIOUS SITES.
You win by doing what we are doing. Actual ordnance laid onto military and terrorist installations; deposing of leaders; manhunts of the enemy leaders; killing of the enemy; and keeping the moral "high ground" in the propaganda aspect of the war.
Never THREATEN...state your POLICY....act if it is not heeded.
88
posted on
11/13/2004 2:32:38 AM PST
by
NetValue
(Trust the cobra before you trust the liberal.)
To: garjog
When your enemy does not care what you do to him because of the expected reward in the great beyond, your only possible way to win is unacceptable mass-murder, or what we are doing, i.e., changing his societies from hate-filled dictatorships to democracies so they will come into the modern world. It is called democratization. If it can be achieved, the Islamics will see that there is more to life than hating America.
This is a much longer and more difficult road to travel. It requires steadfast committment. I am not optimistic that America will stay the course on this since we have learned to avoid doing difficult things or things that take longer than a month to achieve.
89
posted on
11/13/2004 2:41:38 AM PST
by
NetValue
(Trust the cobra before you trust the liberal.)
To: NetValue
We have to be more moral than our enemy and not resort to his kind of tactics.
Seriously, Why do you say this? And exactly what are you saying?
90
posted on
11/13/2004 2:54:45 AM PST
by
expatguy
(Fallujah Delenda Est!!)
To: NetValue
We have to be more moral than our enemy and not resort to his kind of tactics.
Seriously, Why do you say this? And exactly what are you saying?
91
posted on
11/13/2004 2:54:50 AM PST
by
expatguy
(Fallujah Delenda Est!!)
To: NetValue
We have to be more moral than our enemy and not resort to his kind of tactics.
Seriously, Why do you say this? And exactly what are you saying?
92
posted on
11/13/2004 2:55:05 AM PST
by
expatguy
(Fallujah Delenda Est!!)
To: NetValue
your only possible way to win is unacceptable mass-murder, or what we are doing, i.e., changing his societies from hate-filled dictatorships to democracies so they will come into the modern world. It is called democratization. If it can be achievedIF it can be achieved.
Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?
We know that unrestricted anti-civilian warfare can collapse societies and permit their reconstruction along acceptaable lines.
What is the evidence that "democratization" can, in fact, be achieved along the lines you suggest?
93
posted on
11/13/2004 3:02:35 AM PST
by
Jim Noble
(FR Iraq policy debate begins 11/3/04. Pass the word.)
To: Traianus
I'm a day late and a dollar short......ping for later consumption.
94
posted on
11/13/2004 11:46:35 PM PST
by
Chani
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson