Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rave123
First of all,I didn't mention welfare at all.

Secondly,I know that Aleta St.James has the money to take care of her children.

Thirdly,rather than race,I based my replies on the info in the article.Generally 15 year olds (which IS what the article claimed she was,when she had her first child!) aren't usually married and neither do they have jobs.Even the working poor get some government assistance,when they have children and I'm NOT talking about welfare,but programs such as WIC.And this was even MORE true,41 years ago.

Now,don't you feel foolish?

108 posted on 11/12/2004 7:13:07 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: nopardons

Isn't it different being fifteen having a baby in the country then being fifteen and having one in the city? I've known a lot of people from the South who grew up in large young families and they didn't have any government assistance. At least out in the country, you can grow your own food and be more self sufficient.


111 posted on 11/12/2004 7:16:47 PM PST by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

To: nopardons

Actually -no I don't fell foolish, why would I. As I said my news channel said she was 18 and her husband worked. He was also the father of all of the kids including the two to come and they are remarring. Doesn't sound like someone trying to get welfare. And she had a job.
Also, considering WIC, many states do not put restrictions on income for some WIC programs. So the lady in new york could be getting that.
Now don't you feel foolish for your assumptions? Remember the rule about assumptions.


115 posted on 11/12/2004 7:24:20 PM PST by rave123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson