Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ladyinred
Is this really the reason? I mean, they used to just bleep out the language that might offend.

Spielberg's contract w/ ABC sez there is to be no modification of the film whatsoever. Including censorship of dirty words. And frankly, it's quite clear this is not a movie for children, who are the only people I'd really worry about exposing to such language and violence. If grownups can't handle seeing grownup situations on TV, they oughta shut themselves in and never leave the house, because they certainly can't handle Real Life.

In fact, the sitcoms say much the same thing these days.

Hm. Can't recall ever hearing the F-bomb or S-bomb, or a few others, on network TV. Close, but not the actual words.

SW

21 posted on 11/10/2004 11:16:59 PM PST by Snidely Whiplash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Snidely Whiplash

It is Spielberg's work and he can command that (unless and law forbids it) but it is ironic that he manipulates his work to accommodate an anti-gun (anti-violence) agenda as in ET.


26 posted on 11/11/2004 1:03:38 AM PST by endthematrix (CRUSH ISLAMOFACISM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Snidely Whiplash
Spielberg's contract w/ ABC sez there is to be no modification of the film whatsoever. Including censorship of dirty words.

Ah, yes, Spielburg the film purist. And yet they can hack the continuity of the film to pieces to sell Ex-Lax and Depends and Joe Foreman Grills.

Such an artiste.
30 posted on 11/11/2004 4:20:42 AM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson