To: advance_copy
Even if "greenhouse gases" are causing "global warming" (and I've seen no real proof that they are), why is that a bad thing? If the Earth gets warmer, don't more plants grow, creating more oxygen and eliminating more carbon dioxide? What do these so-called "experts" want, another ice age? And how do they know that this warming isn't part of a natural cycle? Also, the Kyoto Treaty is very biased against the United States, and lenient to other nations.
20 posted on
11/07/2004 3:27:07 AM PST by
The Loan Arranger
(The modern definition of 'racist' is someone who is winning an argument with a liberal.)
To: The Loan Arranger
The Senate turned this down on a vote of 98-1...or something like that. While global warming may be occurring, it has occurred before and it was prior to industrialization. Once scientists present a theory, it just goes on and on but will always remain a theory. Darwin is relatively new but they'll never let go....it brings large grants to archeologists etc. just as Global warming grants go to environmental scientists etc..
21 posted on
11/07/2004 3:51:14 AM PST by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson