Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JustPiper
If ACSA is not all that great how was this validated enough to be put up on Rewards?

I know nothing about 'Rewards', I do know their track record that they have posted over the past couple of months. They seemed to have taken credit for a lot with very little to document or support their claims. Their warnings didn't pan out with the certainity they claimed. And now with this 'warning' it appears to be a rehash of old internet rumors. The history they give is too incredable to believe. It is even more incredable that the leader of Pakistan will give his sworn enemy a nuke after they've tried to kill him several times. Futhermore, that Pakisan is in charge of AQ, this is laughable at best. The whole fatwa thing is multiple months old and does nothing to support the alert. This is almost at the same level as the report from the unspeakable site last July. There is a liberal dose of tinfoil necessary in dealing with this 'alert'.

3,387 posted on 11/13/2004 9:01:18 PM PST by Godzilla (I'm really easy to get along with once you people learn to see it my way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3374 | View Replies ]


To: Godzilla

I too was leery from their very first so-called intel


3,472 posted on 11/14/2004 2:18:16 PM PST by JustPiper (NoE-the Enemy !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3387 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson