To: jerseygirl; All
donning tinfoil hat...
I had this thought today. We were discussing the whole "individual states" thing on the last thread. Seems there have to be some things going on.
1. Hitting all the 'red' states at once would be wiser, rather than giving the others time to figure out what's going on and hyper-secure things.
2. There has to be a very large media presence at or very near the point of attack ('view it on CNN)
3. Of course, a large group of people.
This came to me......what meets all of these pre-requisites?
What about state-sponsored inaugural balls?
1. You can hit "individual states" -- at least metaphorically.
2. Huge media presence.
3. Large group of people.
What do ya'll think???
/tinfoil
153 posted on
11/03/2004 1:56:05 PM PST by
kimmie7
(We love you, President Bush! And VP Cheney. And Laura. And Lynne. Even Barney!)
To: kimmie7
The dems always did things at inaugural balls here in Illinois, personally I think that is an excellent point, they should clear all staff handling food!
241 posted on
11/03/2004 8:00:28 PM PST by
JustPiper
(NoE-the Enemy !!!)
To: kimmie7
Definitely they seek a huge media prescence- while our leaders are in their respective bunkers to watch the "hit."
Other than NY, DC, LA, Philly and some other large cities, I'm having a hard time figuring out where they would obtain their audience and the mass deaths they desire.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson