David, thanks. I sent a less detailed version citing sources and speculation. Maybe if they get multiple hits they'll be more inclined to chase it down.
I'm aware that this could all be a diversion to take peoples' attention away from what's really happening, but IMHO we can't afford to ignore anything that looks suspicious. I'd rather have a thousand amateurs chasing wild geese than an overworked gov't guy trying to decide which legitimate lead to deal with first.
One other question, which might or might not have already been addressed, but I feel I need to ask.
If we're reading them, can we assume they're reading us?
I'd say that's very possible. So much so that I would have my name removed from that post. Just for safe measures.
Of course, since I publicly identified myself, I guess I'll have to start carrying.
" can we assume they're reading us?"
Yes. And sometimes there have been directed posting to that effect. One or two even came here.
This is a given. We watch them, they watch us. Sending you freepmail.