Oh, I know and I agree, GW is better than Jokerry any day. Question is why with such a joke of a candidate was it so close this year? I just looked back at 1996 and Clinton won by a much bigger margin than this. And forget the Reaganesque sweeps... I mean, W is a far better prez than Clinton ever was, and as far as being presidential material I think he's as good a leader as Ronnie was. I know Reagan was a better communicator and all.
Yes, I am happy with whatever victory we get, but I think W deserved more than that!!!!!
I agree with you 100%! ;) I think the reason it was so close this year with such a clearly terrible candidate (John Kerry, of course) was because the liberals are too prideful to admit that Bush is a much better leader than Clinton! Like beef said, the libs aren't thinking rationally at all... which is made apparent by the fact that they are voting for John Kerry! Any rational man or woman would never in their right (or left) mind vote for such an America-hating candidate! Just look at his Vietnam war records.
True, Bush could never beat Reagan's communication skills and conservativeness, but like you said, Bush is just as good a leader as Reagan.
By the way, nice to meet you astonberry!