Click the link for a PDF of the decision.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40 last
To: RightFighter
I don't get this. This is a decision by the Ohio Supreme Court - the highest state court in Ohio - but I thought that the Dems got a temporary restraining order against challenges at the polling place in U.S. District Court, and that the matter was presently being reviewed by the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals.
Anyone want to 'splain this to me?
40 posted on
11/01/2004 5:21:35 PM PST by
BCrago66
To: RightFighter
Holy Tamales!
A set of judges who actually rule on what the law IS, not what their partisan ideology WANTS IT TO BE?
What's this world comin' to?
This is really, REALLY good news!! The Dem fraud machine in Ohio just got kicked in the cajones.
42 posted on
11/01/2004 5:21:43 PM PST by
jstolzen
(All it takes for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing - Edmund Burke)
To: RightFighter
This is why winning the elsction is so damn important. Conservative judges who foolow the law and the Constitution.
54 posted on
11/01/2004 5:26:30 PM PST by
jwalsh07
To: RightFighter
Thank God. Fifty years and not a peep out of the Democrats until now??
They should have changed it back when they were voting it into law...
59 posted on
11/01/2004 5:30:45 PM PST by
dandelion
(http://johnkerryquestionfairy.blogspot.com/)
To: RightFighter
YES!! Whooo F'in hooooo!!
60 posted on
11/01/2004 5:30:55 PM PST by
Gimme
To: RightFighter
Too late for RATs to whine to SCOTUS!!!
To: RightFighter
Doltt, put some ice on it baby!
To: RightFighter
FANTASTIC news!!! Just heard it too.
Nam Vet
98 posted on
11/01/2004 5:39:00 PM PST by
Nam Vet
(MSM reporters think the MOIST dream they had the night before is a "reliable source".)
To: RightFighter
Another Festivus miracle!!!
To: RightFighter
If Micheal Moore can put his cameras there to watch people, why can't we?
$20 says that this leads to calls of voter "disenfranchisement" and Jesse Jackson pays a visit to Ohio if Kerry loses.
101 posted on
11/01/2004 5:39:32 PM PST by
Quick1
To: RightFighter
Fox just said the Appeals court ruled for the Republicans.....
104 posted on
11/01/2004 5:41:06 PM PST by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
To: RightFighter
FREEPERS, make sure you hit this poll immediately. Bump it to the top of the news page. More Americans need to hear about it!
A Kerry endorsement (Bin Laden)108 posted on
11/01/2004 5:41:50 PM PST by
Capitalism2003
(America is too great for small dreams. - Ronald Reagan, speech to Congress. January 1, 1984.)
To: RightFighter
Does this mean that Mary Poppins won't get to vote?
To: RightFighter
This is a decision of the OSC, but the latest dcsision actually came down from the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals saying that Observers ARE allowed to be inside the Precinct.
RamS
120 posted on
11/01/2004 5:44:37 PM PST by
RamingtonStall
(Ride Hard and far! ..... and with GPS, Know where you are!)
To: RightFighter
AMEN. This and similar recent situations are just appalling. There must be some legal redress available with respect to these lower judges spec., lack of fitness to continue serving. When this is all over, reviews, invetigations - whatever it takes - these jokers ought to be sent back to school, or removed from their jobs.
To: RightFighter
To all, these rules about the challengers have been in place the last 51 years! It seems the rats are trying to change the rules, after the game again! TO ALL GOP LAWYERS, YOU ROCK!! GO BUSH!
133 posted on
11/01/2004 5:49:45 PM PST by
Bush gal in LA
(Armed with what? SPITBALLS? Zell Miller)
To: RightFighter
Did anyone else hear Allison on Fox just a few minutes ago?? I was shocked,... she seemed ticked off at the decision?
How is it so evil to have people there to watch? They claim intimidation,.. but what can we possibly do? There will be police and election officials. If they won't let you vote, ask for both and let's find the reason why they wouldn't let you. Chances are they will run(because they aren't legal, registered, etc....), and if you're running there's a good chance you have something to hide. We aren't out to limit voters. We just want them to be legit and not dragged off the street with no knowledge of what they are actually doing. I agree that the ignorant have a right to vote,....but there should be a limit on it, and the Dims cashed all those chips in long ago!!
Intimidation. How? Everyone and their dog will be in Ohio. If someone tries to prevent you from voting,.... scream. Chances are,....you haven't registered and aren't supposed to be voting. Why else would the Dims object to confirming voters??? Is that such a freakin' crime??? Confirming that the people voting are registered and supposed to vote?? Confirming that all is fair???? What is wrong with that??? Hey Dims,... what is wrong with that???? Because it's easier to say people were prevented(more than likely people that never registered, or were not eligible in the first place) than it is to prove they weren't. It is sickening what the Dim's have become. It was insulting before,... they are unGodly now. Sad.
To: RightFighter
The current picture of the Ohio State Supremes shows 5 Republicans and 2 Democrats.
That could come in handy later on.
159 posted on
11/01/2004 6:12:12 PM PST by
xzins
(Retired Army and Proudly Supporting BUSH/CHENEY 2004!)
To: RightFighter
A hugh victory for the GOP, Ohio will go Bush now.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson