Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Freesofar

why would they file a challenge in federal court.. are they dense?


3 posted on 10/28/2004 12:08:49 AM PDT by GeronL (FREE KERRY'S SCARY bumper sticker .......... http://www.kerrysscary.com/bumper_sticker.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GeronL
The loser will want the three lost votes and go to the Supremes claiming disenfranchisement based on chnging the rules during the election.

It makes me think this will drag out the ratification for weeks.

6 posted on 10/28/2004 12:20:50 AM PDT by Freesofar (We need W to win ....the WWOT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: GeronL
why would they file a challenge in federal court..?

Because it's a federal issue.

From Art. II, Sec. 1 of the U.S. Constitution:

"Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector."

There's the federal issue: there is no provision for revising the manner of allocation of Presidential Electors by ballot initiative. The Constitution specifically requires that the state legislatures determine this issue. Thus, the CO ballot initiative is unconstitutional.

And this federal judge is an idiot.

11 posted on 10/28/2004 12:28:53 AM PDT by Cincinatus (Omnia relinquit servare Republicam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson