To: GeronL
The loser will want the three lost votes and go to the Supremes claiming disenfranchisement based on chnging the rules during the election.
It makes me think this will drag out the ratification for weeks.
6 posted on
10/28/2004 12:20:50 AM PDT by
Freesofar
(We need W to win ....the WWOT)
To: Freesofar
Just hope the thing loses big
8 posted on
10/28/2004 12:24:04 AM PDT by
GeronL
(FREE KERRY'S SCARY bumper sticker .......... http://www.kerrysscary.com/bumper_sticker.php)
To: Freesofar
Rather, I am convinced that this measure would not pass constitutional muster in the SCOTUS.
Without going into details, I've read it, and on it's face it would not stand up.
I don't think that this judge wanted to interject himself into this mess during an election, knowing full well the question can wait to go (quickly) to SCOTUS if needed.
I can't believe a who;e state would be so stupid as to vote this measure in.
12 posted on
10/28/2004 12:32:47 AM PDT by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson