[stockpirate]

This has also been reported on Rush and a caller made the point and Rush looked it up.

[Dems_R_Losers]

It's in a front page Washington Post story today.

[So Cal Rocket]

"If you mean dying in the course of the United Nations effort, yes, it is worth that. If you mean dying American troops unilaterally going in with some false presumption that we can affect the outcome, the answer is unequivocally no."

[Defiant]

Sounds like his answer is meant in the context of the Balkans--he's ok with deaths if we go over on behalf of the UN, but not on our own. I don't think it's a statement of general principle (although I think Kerry does think this), and Kerry can point to his support of unilateral action on Iraq when Clinton was President.

[Se7eN]

It's official.. It's a conspiracy to get Bush re-elected.

[So Cal Rocket]

Who needs an October Surprise when John Kerry's own mouth is the gift that keeps on giving.

[hawkaw]

Click here for Washington Post Story on Kerry's 1994 Quote

To bypass registration at the Washington Post please use the Email address "fedup@mailinator.com" and the password "fedup"

[MaineRepublic]

Why did it take them this long to find a good Kerry quote like that. He's been in the Senate for 20 years. He should have all sorts of quotes and statements that can be used against him by now.

[snooker]

Kerry is an original peacnik. Kerry became a peacenik when he realized he could mortgage his Vietnam service for a political career, all he had to do was what the Democrats in Congress wanted him to do -- Hang their Vietnam war on Nixon's neck. He did. Kerry has a voting record to match, he has a 20 year record dumping on the US military. He is a UN worshiping hippie, through and through. Given the chance, Kerry will gladly transfer our sovereignty to the UN, piece by piece.

Why does Kerry want to be President of the US when he wants to turn everything over to the UN?

[Cyber Ninja]

Sometimes sKerry-speak is a little thick for me.

Do I have this right?

US troops dying for the UN = OK, worth it.

US troops dying for USA = NOT OK, not worth it.

CB^?

[Fiddlstix]

BTTT

[NavVet]

Someone should post this beside his 1970 Boston Globe interview in which he said he belived American troops should only go overseas under the command of the U.N.

[Woogit]

I pray we will be seeing a slew of ads just using Kerry's own stuff!

[AmericanChef]

So, this leaves us with the question: when exactly does a coalition of whatever kind cross the line from "unilateral" to "multilateral"? Is it after 5 countries join? 10? 25?

Give us a number, you unAmerican gigolo, if you dare. If you can't give us a number, it means you'll only accept the term "multi" if it includes specific other countries. Great Britian not good enough for ya? Who, then? What country EXACTLY is so much more important to you than the United States of America?

Hmm...let me guess.