Skip to comments.
Open letter to President Bush, Rush, Hannity, Congress, Freepers re military requirments.
Oct 20, 2004
| tame
Posted on 10/20/2004 6:53:06 AM PDT by tame
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-170 next last
To: Conspiracy Guy
I know the feeling..spoke to a recrutier they won't touch me till I get my weight down and am off BP meds for a couple months.
21
posted on
10/20/2004 7:20:43 AM PDT
by
Americanwolf
(Paintball Gun: $44..Accessories: $55. Protecting campaign sign from Union thugs: Priceless!)
To: tame
If you're willing to drive a gasoline tanker truck you're better than some younger ones we now have. Good luck.
22
posted on
10/20/2004 7:21:31 AM PDT
by
bayourod
(Old Media news is poll driven, not event driven, not fact driven, not newsworthy driven.)
To: airborne
thank you :o) would you support legislation to let older kids like me into the military?
23
posted on
10/20/2004 7:21:33 AM PDT
by
tame
(Are you willing to do for the truth what leftists are willing to do for a lie?)
To: tame
There are many jobs in the service that do not require you be fleet of foot of sharp eyed so why not allow others who are perhaps over the combat enlistment age to join in other capcities. I believe in WWII the cutoff was over 40. Perhaps 45 if you were single.
FWIW, I was very active up to 40. Surfing, skiing and desert motorbikes. I did not feel I was too many steps behind the young guns and definitly able to contribute to the cause.
Edison
24
posted on
10/20/2004 7:22:42 AM PDT
by
Edison
To: Conspiracy Guy
39 my butt. I'm 50 with prior service, USAF 72-76, I want to serve too. I'll clean toilets or carry an M-16. I don't care I just want to serve again!I turned 57 on the 10th. Blind in my right eye and disabled but I can blow the balls off a flea at 50 yds with my 9mm and good eye. USAF 66-70.
25
posted on
10/20/2004 7:23:01 AM PDT
by
afnamvet
(Tuy Hoa AB RVN 68-69 Jet Noise...The Sound of Freedom!)
To: tame
I have sent stuff in on this before.
I think some of our "more seasoned" people would be a boon to the military. The expirance that age can bring to a situation is as important as the vigor and tough as nails attitude of youth.
26
posted on
10/20/2004 7:23:16 AM PDT
by
Americanwolf
(Paintball Gun: $44..Accessories: $55. Protecting campaign sign from Union thugs: Priceless!)
To: Old Sarge
thanx for that info, sarge :o)
What do you think of raising the age restriction during this time of war? any reason it cannot (or should not) be done?
27
posted on
10/20/2004 7:23:33 AM PDT
by
tame
(Are you willing to do for the truth what leftists are willing to do for a lie?)
To: Conspiracy Guy
28
posted on
10/20/2004 7:23:39 AM PDT
by
wallcrawlr
( W-innesota)
To: FourtySeven
Upper limit without prior service is 35 years and 364 days of age.
If you're prior service and coming back in, then we grade it up:
36-38, if 1 year in;
38-41, if at least 2 years in;
Older than 41, 2 years prior plus one year for each age over 40.
Example: I could have waited until I was 44 (I was 6yrs. active, so that's 2 years plus 4 over 40)
29
posted on
10/20/2004 7:24:43 AM PDT
by
Old Sarge
(K'nigget-Commander. Sergeant-At-Arms, Sentinel of Meetingplaces both Clandestine and Public.)
To: tame
Age should not be a deterrent if all pyhsical requirements are met.
30
posted on
10/20/2004 7:26:12 AM PDT
by
airborne
(God answers all prayers. Sometimes the answer is ,"No".)
To: Americanwolf
I think some of our "more seasoned" people would be a boon to the military. The expirance that age can bring to a situation is as important as the vigor and tough as nails attitude of youth.i agree. in many ways i would be far better "qualified" now than when I was out of high school.
31
posted on
10/20/2004 7:26:26 AM PDT
by
tame
(Are you willing to do for the truth what leftists are willing to do for a lie?)
To: Conspiracy Guy
My husband has prior service and when he was around 52, they were still trying to get him to sign up in the guards. They promised him easy work if he would just re-op. Maybe you could try the National Guards.
32
posted on
10/20/2004 7:26:34 AM PDT
by
beckysueb
(Kerry/Edwards light is the only one flickering.)
To: Old Sarge
36-38, if 1 year in;can't we just SAY we have one or two years in :o)
33
posted on
10/20/2004 7:27:49 AM PDT
by
tame
(Are you willing to do for the truth what leftists are willing to do for a lie?)
To: Edison
I believe in WWII the cutoff was over 40. Perhaps 45 if you were single.hmmmm. sounds good to me :o)
34
posted on
10/20/2004 7:28:57 AM PDT
by
tame
(Are you willing to do for the truth what leftists are willing to do for a lie?)
To: airborne
yes, wouldn't that be age discrimination. If you can handle the physical regime why not.
The only problem I see with older people getting in would be their meeting/committee experiences. You should be young and fearless when first joining. Could you see several 40 year olds discussing the merits of taking a building? Not saying they wouldn't, there just might be several discussions about how to go about it.
Edison
35
posted on
10/20/2004 7:32:13 AM PDT
by
Edison
To: zboa
I too tried, they smiled and shook their head NO. I'm 43, in fair shape but no prior. there has GOT to be a way. hmmmmmmmm.
36
posted on
10/20/2004 7:32:59 AM PDT
by
tame
(Are you willing to do for the truth what leftists are willing to do for a lie?)
To: George W. Bush; Karl Rove; Don Rumsfeld
if i promise you the re-election, can you promise me military service?
37
posted on
10/20/2004 7:35:31 AM PDT
by
tame
(Are you willing to do for the truth what leftists are willing to do for a lie?)
To: John Kerry; Howlin
John, if you get elected then i might decide to choose another career besides the military because...you're a TRAITOR!
38
posted on
10/20/2004 7:38:49 AM PDT
by
tame
(Are you willing to do for the truth what leftists are willing to do for a lie?)
To: Old Sarge
That's what I understood, as well:
http://usmilitary.about.com/library/weekly/aa082701a.htm
Still, I think Tame makes a really good arguement (tho that particular choice of usernames seems a bit contradictory ;)!)
There SHOULD be a special amendment, to account for war-time military demands. His mention of the draft is an excellent example, and directly negates (or at least deminishes) the need for a draft (aka conscription) program!
I would email / contact my local rep's (but oddly enough, the NC rep's [not discounting Mrs. Dole] are all Dem's). Still, I personally support such an ammendment! Let's hope that the few non-MSM journalist, radio hosts & tv spokesman will pick this up!!
39
posted on
10/20/2004 7:40:51 AM PDT
by
Avalon66
To: Ann Coulter; Syncro
Dear Ann,
Could you ask some of your well placed friends to help me? Maybe Syncro :o)
40
posted on
10/20/2004 7:43:42 AM PDT
by
tame
(Are you willing to do for the truth what leftists are willing to do for a lie?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-170 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson