Posted on 10/19/2004 1:51:58 AM PDT by BritishBulldog
It has happened several times:
John Quincy Adams was elected to the House of Representatives (where he later collapsed and died) after being President.
President William Howard Taft was later made Chief Justice of the United States by President Harding.
President John Tyler later became a member of the Confederate House of Representatives.
Grover Cleveland was the only President to leave the White House and return for a second term four years later.
President Andrew Johnson was elected to Congress after being President.
John Calhoun served as VP under John Quincy Adams and then Andrew Jackson. He resigned as Vice President to accept a Senate seat from his home state.
Levi Morton served as VP under Benjamin Harrison, and was later elected Governor of New York (I think it's New York.)
"Chief Justice Bill Clinton has an even more awful ring to it."
Since he was disbarred as a lawyer in Arkansas, I don't think we will have to fear that happening. Or maybe we do if a crazy like Kerry gets into office.
It has to do with personal and party power. The fear is that he and his party will build such a following of appointed officials and elected people who are beholden to him that he may be tempted to refuse to leave, and try to take over government entirely. Dictator, or king?
In the UK all of the top government officials, the Ministers in the Cabinet, are elected members of Parliament. Thus, their own positions are unstable enough for them to be a natural check on the Prime Minister.
In the USA, however, the President appoints his own cabinet, and just has to get the Senate to agree to them. Thus there is more potential for abuse if a President remains in office for to long.
I think the grooming proccess for Rudy Gulianni starts around the same time
Sure he could, but it would be a cut in pay.
Once President, any lower office, without all the perks and the people who just dont respect your lower office and the hassles that would cause, why work?
Plus, as ex-president, you can get over $100,000 for just giving a speech, why work? Just give 3 or 4 speeches a year.
A former President may run for another elected office, except for the Vice-Presidency.
It happened at least once: John Quincy Adams ran for US Congressional office and won, after having served as President.
He continued to get re-elected until his death, which occurred during a session of the House of Representatives shortly after he collapsed there, at his desk. His sole purpose, he stated, in serving in the House was to secure the abolition of slavery.
He tied the House in knots so effectively with his persistent, powerful speeches and procedural tactics, that a rule was passed forbidding the issue to be debated.
But he was respected by those who opposed his policy. He was instrumental in the growth of the idea that owning slaves was antithetical to our God given, inalienable rights stated in the Declaration of Independence, the document upon which America was founded, even though slavery was legal.
Well technically they can succeed themselves twice but only under special circumstances.
If they have served a partial term that is less than two years(think Ford replacing Nixon or LBJ succeeding Kennedy.) then they can serve two normal terms as well. If however they serve over two years in a partial term then they get only one shot at re-election.
You know what would be a lot of fun though...Bill Clinton gets elected to the UN presidency, then congress cuts off UN funds due to the oil for food scandal and other sorts of corruption...hee hee.
Well, that is daft, now that you have brought it up. That is why true conservatives (standing by the Constitution) do not advocate "term limits". The Republicans of many years ago were literally at their wit's end when they passed term limits for President. Lately, some neo-cons have attempted the same thing for members of Congress.
A far better approach is to educate the voters as to what is going on in Congress, and then they themselves will hold their representative's feet to the fire, and hold them accountable for the votes in Congress. The "term limits" idea is greatly flawed in its fundamentals, and should never see the light of day.
In a term-limited Congress, there would be absolutely no need for any politician to adhere to his constituencies' wishes, as he would not ever need to face their displeasure in the polls. The result would be even more irresponsible, unconstitutional, and repressive bills passed in Congress. It would literally create a runaway Socialist government with no limits.
What makes you think a nominee has to be a lawyer?
I seem to recall Earl Warren was not an attorney. Probably our most destructive Supreme Court, ever.
We Texans are hoping that when "W" finishes FOUR MORE YEARS that he will come back to Texas, lead us in seceding from the dimocrat socialist union after which, we crown him King of the Republic of Texas.
It's happened several times, but not recently. John Quincy Adams was president from 1824 to 1828, and then was elected to the House of Representatives in 1830. He served there until his death in 1848. John Tyler served in the confederate congress for a year before he died. William Howard Taft was appointed Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Other presidents, like Roosevelt and Van Buren ran on third part tickets but lost.
Brown has done mighty things in Oakland. I hate to say it, but he has.
Hubert Humphrey (Vice-President under Lyndon Johnson) became a US Senator after finishing his term as VP.
Check out John Quincy Adams....after president I think he became a congresscritter.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.