Posted on 10/18/2004 6:45:55 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
John Kerry has adopted the classic Democratic strategy of class-war demagoguery. During his campaign, he has repeatedly pledged to increase taxes on the "rich"--i.e. Americans earning more than $2000,000 per year--while providing additional government benefits to the middle class.
In fact, Kerry has a long and consistent record of voting against tax cuts and in favor of tax increases--no matter what the income level of the taxpayers in question.
In the 12 years since the National Taxpayers Union began grading the voting records of members of Congress on tax-and-spending issues, Kerry has received the grade of "F" eleven times.
He voted against the Bush tax cuts in 2001 and 2003, which lowered the income tax rates for the lowest brackets.
He repeatedly voted against elimintaing the marriage penalty.
He also supported the provision in Presidnet Clinton's 1993 stax hike that increased taxes on the elderly middle-class by taxing the Social Security benefits of people earning a mere $32,000 per yaer or more.
(Excerpt) Read more at humaneventsonline.com ...
I have got to find that data sheet on how the democrats have raised costs and taxes and premiums on Soc Sec and medicare. My elderly mother is afraid, thanks to Kerry lies, that if Bush is re-elected my 89 year old aunt will lose her $800/month SS check. And my mother said her medicare went up. She blames Bush. I tried to explain to her that some of these changes were put into place during Clinton, and timed to take effect after he left office. I have to find that data sheet about all the times SS has been messed with and it was Democrats who did it. The democrats have nothing good to run on so they LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE.
He also supported the provision in President Clinton's 1993 tax hike that increased taxes on the elderly middle-class by taxing the Social Security benefits of people earning a mere $32,000 per year or more?
Social Security recipients, in my opinion, have far more to fear from Kerry than they do Bush, if they should fear Bush at all, despite Kerry's apparent mediscare tactics.
http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=4952
How the hell does Kerry think he has moral authority to even comment on this? Between his wife only paying $1250 into SS and Medicare on $5.7 million in income, and Breck boy's $591,000 Medicare tax avoidance, the RNC should be frying him!
The Kerry ad, however, is attacking a plan that doesnt yet exist.
Well, if you go to his web site and read his plan on taxes he says he wants to revert the top two tax brackets to their Clinton levels. Fine. The problem here is if he returns the 2nd tier to the Clinton level, it can go down to those earning $80K a year. NOT the $200K and above he always says.
I thought he was supposed to be a smart person.
As for Social Security, President Bush will strengthen and enhance Social Security, guaranteeing no changes in benefits for current retirees and near-retirees, while giving younger workers the opportunity to use their Social Security payroll taxes to build a nest egg for retirement that can be passed on to their families. I don't see where this would be a threat to women (or to anyone, for that matter). Where does John Kerry stand on the issue of Social Security? Who knows - he keeps changing his position. He has been on both sides - and no one really knows where he would stand if elected. We do know that as a senator, he voted twice for Clinton's $241 billion tax hike on Social Security, three times to keep the hike and three times against repealing the 1993 increase.
AARP REJECTS KERRYS MEANS TESTING IDEA
AARP Spokeswoman Rejects Social Security Means Testing Suggested By Kerry. A spokeswoman for the AARP said that it did not support means-testing for social security recipients. (Glen Johnson, Kerry Hints At Reform For Social Security, The Boston Globe, 8/14/03)
Means Testing Would Eliminate Social Security For Some Americans. Means testing would completely eliminate benefits for people above a certain income level. (AARP, The Policy Book: AARP Public Policies 2003, 2003)
KERRYS ALREADY TAXED SENIORS SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS
In 1993, Voted Five Times To Tax Social Security Benefits. (S. Con. Res. 18, CQ Vote #57: Motion Agreed To 52-47: R 0-43; D 52-4, 3/24/93, Kerry Voted Yea; S. Con. Res. 18, CQ Vote #59: Motion Agreed To 55-44: R 0-43; D 55-1, 3/24/93, Kerry Voted Yea; S. 1134, CQ Vote #169: Motion Agreed To 51-46: R 1-41; D 50-5, 6/24/93, Kerry Voted Yea; H.R. 2264, CQ Vote #190: Passed 49-49: R 0-43; D 49-6, With Vice President Al Gore Casting A Yea Vote, 6/25/93, Kerry Voted Yea; H.R. 2264, CQ Vote #247: Adopted 51-50: R 0-44; D 50-6, With Vice President Al Gore Casting A Yea Vote, 8/6/93, Kerry Voted Yea)
Hiked Taxes On Middle Class Senior Citizens Social Security Benefits. Kerry voted to raise the tax on senior citizens Social Security benefits, affecting seniors making as little as $34,000. (John H. Cushman Jr., The Budget Struggle; Wealthy Or Not, Taxpayers Will Find Plenty Of Surprises, The New York Times, 8/8/93)
Voted Three Times Against Repealing Social Security Tax Hike. (S. Con. Res. 57, CQ Vote #142: Adopted 50-48: R 49-4; D 1-44, May 22, 1996, Kerry Voted Nay; H.R. 8, CQ Vote #188: Adopted 58-41: R 54-1; D 4-40, 7/13/00, Kerry Voted Nay; S. Con. Res. 23, CQ Vote #94: Rejected 48-51: R 48-3; D 0-47; I 0-1, 3/25/03, Kerry Voted Nay)
BTTT
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.