Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tradesports: 10,000 shares sold bush futures: Clear market manipulation today
Tradesports.com Bush futures ^

Posted on 10/15/2004 11:38:53 AM PDT by drangundsturm

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: drangundsturm

Is it possible this guy's just got two accounts, then put in a bid to buy 10,000 at 10 the same time his other account put in a sell 10,000 at 10?

he'd only be out the commission paid (I think).


41 posted on 10/15/2004 11:53:47 AM PDT by Flashlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

"will cost you $54.00 to get $100.00"


I understand as much, what I want to know is how many total contracts are outstanding times the dollar value of a contract to be able to see how much money it would take to manipulate prices.


42 posted on 10/15/2004 11:54:26 AM PDT by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

George Soros could.


43 posted on 10/15/2004 11:55:01 AM PDT by RockinRight (John Kerry is the wrong candidate, for the wrong country, at the wrong time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: All

Since the inception, 40,000 Kerry contracts have been sold compared to 700,000 Bush contracts


44 posted on 10/15/2004 11:56:19 AM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
The limit by IEM has good points and bad points. The good point is no single person can have this kind of effect. The bad point is, the market is probably less liquid because of this and traders who are really smart can't fully participate to the level their means allows.

But the two markets stay in near lock-step because of arbitragers. The iowa market is usually a few percent under the tradesports becuase they have different payoff parameters (IEM tracks who will get the majority of 2-party vote, this particular tradesports market pays off if bush wins the electoral vote, which is not quite the same as we all know;)

45 posted on 10/15/2004 11:57:09 AM PDT by drangundsturm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: drangundsturm

You can't conclude "clear market manipulation by some entity" without talking to the trader or market maker and knowing the background reason behind the sale.

For all anyone knows, he could have been raising some cash to place on football bets this weekend.


46 posted on 10/15/2004 11:57:59 AM PDT by gipper81 (Hey! When's the October surprise coming???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politicalities

All these things are a buying opportunity.


47 posted on 10/15/2004 11:59:43 AM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bob
Somebody sure picked up a bunch at really low prices. When a huge block spikes the price down like that, wouldn't having a limit offer in place have gotten you the futures at the low price?

Yes, it would. Good idea. I'll put in a big buy order in the 40s.

The only problem is that you need to keep an eye on it, and be ready to move quickly to cancel the order if there's a sudden campaign development, like a major gaffe.

48 posted on 10/15/2004 12:00:05 PM PDT by Politicalities (http://www.politicalities.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6
An interesting point is that the downspike occurred in bush's graph but not kerry's. This almost certainly means somebody sold short bush contracts, or they accumulated lots of bush contracts over time and dumped them all at once. (The lack of a similar spike on kerry's graph means this was not the work of arbitragers reacting to a kerry spike. The spike on bush was too short lived for arbitragers to get in on the goods apparently).

But you can see how idiotic this trader was. Even if bush eventually loses, this trade was just plain stupid. If you really thought bush had a near 100% chance of losing, you would slowly accumulate your position over time to maximize your profit. You'd short 100 shares, then wait a while and do 100 more, etc., over a period of days. You would not dump 10k shares in 2 minutes.

49 posted on 10/15/2004 12:01:41 PM PDT by drangundsturm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: drangundsturm

Exactly....thats why i think it may have been a glich.....If it was a bonafide trade whoever did it probably went about it in the worst possible way like they wanted to lose money. Now there might have been dome small fish that got caught up in it and panic sold after seeing what was happening....they are SOL


50 posted on 10/15/2004 12:05:26 PM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: drangundsturm
Thanks for the info..I didn't realize that the IEM was consturcted on the majority of the two party vote, and NOT the EC total.. For anyone who ever bet on a football game, that's a possibility for a fantastic "middle"..

I've read your posts on these futures markets before, and enjoyed them. Please ping me when you do so again..regards..

51 posted on 10/15/2004 12:07:28 PM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: drangundsturm

Maybe it's a bad tick?


52 posted on 10/15/2004 12:07:48 PM PDT by OneTimeLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys; drangundsturm

BTW, in the commodity pits, "white raisin" and "Juniper berry" contracts have soared to record values..


53 posted on 10/15/2004 12:08:47 PM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: drangundsturm

Am I correct in saying if the trade was not a glich, someone burned up about 45K in the trade ?


54 posted on 10/15/2004 12:11:18 PM PDT by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gipper81
For all anyone knows, he could have been raising some cash to place on football bets this weekend.

While there could be other explanations I believe they are far-fetched. There are far easier ways to raise money than to make obviously bad trades. For example, he could have shorted a smaller number, waited for the market to recover, then shorted again. He would have raised a lot more money that way in almost the same period of time. This was just throwing money away. Some of his volume was actually BELOW 13! That's a ludicrous way to raise money. He could have shorted the market down to the 40's, waited 15 minutes for the bids to come back, then done the same thing again.

There are only 3 reasons I can think of to trade in this fashion: (1) trying to manipulate the market, and (2) he has some inside info that bush is definitely going to lose, and it is very, very time critical so he had no choice but to act in a single huge trade. (3) he is arbitraging some other market that is seriously out of whack. This could be a bookie offsetting a huge positive bet on bush perhaps?

If we don't hear some kind of devastating bush news in the next couple of hours it's either (2) or (3), or something hard to imagine.

55 posted on 10/15/2004 12:11:56 PM PDT by drangundsturm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: drangundsturm

Is that the one Rush was talking about today?

Makes sense to me!


56 posted on 10/15/2004 12:12:05 PM PDT by funkywbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drangundsturm
"You could put in a BID for 100 shares at $20 or $25 and hope he does it again. Then, five minutes later when the price is back to $55 you sell out your position at $50+ and bag thousands of bucks for a few minutes "work".

Paging Hillary Clinton.........will the Jnr Senator from New York pick up the phone.

This is better than cattle futures....

I also got a timber company for sale....

57 posted on 10/15/2004 12:13:10 PM PDT by spokeshave ( "I own a timber company? That's news to me!!" ... Ya need some wood?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: KrazyEyezKillah

are the political futures out of the Vegas sports shops around the same line? ... I always thought that sports odds making had to be the truest poll - actually reflecting the voters (bettors) preference ...


58 posted on 10/15/2004 12:13:19 PM PDT by Republicus2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: drangundsturm

Has leveled off now at 55.2...what do you suppose those 10000 shares averaged on price?....he would have had to be selling all the way down


59 posted on 10/15/2004 12:16:11 PM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: OneTimeLurker

I'm not sure what you mean by a bad tick. I happened to be watching carefully at the time. Volume went from approximately 5000 to approximately 15,000 in the span of approximately 2 minutes. I saw the BID side shrink, shrink, shrink. In about 5 screen paints there were no bids left at all. 5 minutes later the bids started coming back up into the 40s then the 50s. The graph for "today" shows this spike. There has been no correction issued so far. I suppose it's possible that this is some kind of software glitch at tradesports, if so I would expect a correction to be posted soon.


60 posted on 10/15/2004 12:17:11 PM PDT by drangundsturm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson