Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ebert Review: Team America
Chicago Sun Times ^ | 10/15/2004 | Roger Ebert

Posted on 10/15/2004 12:48:41 AM PDT by Kornev

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 next last
To: Kornev

If liberals hate it, it must be one of the best movies ever.


61 posted on 10/15/2004 11:40:08 AM PDT by Porterville (NEED SOME WOOD?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kornev
I wasn't offended by the movie's content so much as by its nihilism. At a time when the world is in crisis and the country faces an important election, the response of Parker, Stone and company is to sneer at both sides --

Coming from Ebert this is irony of the highest order.

62 posted on 10/15/2004 12:04:27 PM PDT by CaptRon (Pedecaris alive or Raisuli dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kornev

Sometimes when the film is not liberal enough, he hates it even more, like "The Life of David Gale" (no stars):

The movie is set in Texas, which in a good year all by itself carries out half the executions in America. Death Row in Texas is like the Roach Motel: Roach checks in, doesn't check out. When George W. Bush was Texas governor, he claimed to carefully consider each and every execution, although a study of his office calendar shows he budgeted 15 minutes per condemned man (we cannot guess how many of these minutes were devoted to pouring himself a cup of coffee before settling down to the job). Still, when you're killing someone every other week and there's an average of 400 more waiting their turn, you have to move right along... While Texas continues to warehouse condemned men with a system involving lawyers who are drunk, asleep or absent; confessions that are beaten out of the helpless, and juries that overwhelmingly prefer to execute black defendants instead of white ones, you can't make this movie. Not in Texas.
http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20030221/REVIEWS/302210304/1023


63 posted on 10/15/2004 12:06:45 PM PDT by dogbowl (ask the sierra club about immigration!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dick Vomer

I thought we were calling it the "Bro." LOL.

If Ebert hates it - it's a definately "must-see."


64 posted on 10/15/2004 12:11:55 PM PDT by mykroar (Red Rocks Rally - Ticket in hand!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

I just saw the movie. It's hilarious. It's a movie I'd see again.


65 posted on 10/15/2004 12:25:06 PM PDT by isthisnickcool (Only dummies play poker with George W. Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Kornev

If Ebert hates it, it has to be good!


66 posted on 10/15/2004 12:47:51 PM PDT by Bacon Man (Great! Well when Marrakech gets overrun by mutant lizard people, don't come crying to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

You can't trust Ebert with any political movie. Actually, you get a very good idea of what the movie is about if you read the whole review and ignore the star nonsense.


67 posted on 10/15/2004 1:27:55 PM PDT by AmishDude (If I want on your ping list, I will ask you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All

Ebert is trying to make this into a movie that bashes both sides, but it is not.

The ONLY element of anti-conservatism perhaps is that we blow everything up element. Ebert's attempt at making the crude disguises a political statement is ridiculous. And even the we blow everything up element is not much of a statement since I have heard the movie concludes with the message that although not perfect, somebody needs to step up.

"No real point is made about the actors' activism; they exist in the movie essentially to be ridiculed for existing at all, I guess."

I guess Ebert has not read the interviews with Trey and Matt. Yes, you fat idiot, it very much is an attack on them pesonally.


68 posted on 10/15/2004 1:30:34 PM PDT by rwfromkansas (BYPASS FORCED WEB REGISTRATION! **** http://www.bugmenot.com ****)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
I thought the Dems were too far to the right for him

I read his review of the motorcycle diaries, and he had what might have been the most hilarious or sad lines I have ever read. He basically said that Che and Castro were actually right wingers and not communists, because they suppressed free speech and independent thought. I wonder whether Ebert is really that stupid or just such a big shill for the left that he doesn't really understand the evils of Communism.
69 posted on 10/15/2004 1:37:49 PM PDT by sharkhawk (It's 5 O'clock somewhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All

BTW, the blow everything element is satire of Hollywood action movies, not a political statement really, according to Trey and Matt.

Thus, when you actually read their words....though they say nobody should vote based on this movie....it largely is a conservative film since the one element liberals are pointing to and saying "yay!" at, the blowing everything up element, really is not a political statement at all.


70 posted on 10/15/2004 1:37:51 PM PDT by rwfromkansas (BYPASS FORCED WEB REGISTRATION! **** http://www.bugmenot.com ****)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Kornev
Hmm...apparently, these times aren't serious enough to make Ebert concerned that Michael Moore is harming the nation by polluting people's minds with two hours' worth of easily discredited lies and crackpot conspiracy theories about their commander-in-chief during wartime.

Ebert has always let his squishy political/social beliefs shade his movie reviews, particularly of comedies. The last time I was naive enough to listen to him was way back when "Down and Out In Beverly Hills" came out. He and Siskel lauded it as "the most hilarious satire of the past 10 years." So I threw away five bucks and two hours of my life on a lame, poorly-written piece of nothing that made me laugh exactly one time (at a throw-away gag that was probably ad-libbed on the set). It was so berefit of comic imagination, it actually ended with people jumping into a swimming pool with tuxes on, just to put something in front of the camera lens that approximated comic action of some sort, even if it had already been done to death by Mack Sennett by 1915. But it was anti-rich and pro-homeless, so it had to be brilliant.

I've never seen a movie on Ebert's recommendation since. This only makes me more excited about seeing "Team America," if such a thing is possible.

71 posted on 10/15/2004 1:42:16 PM PDT by HHFi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
"PREPOSTEROUSLY juvenile but fiendishly clever"

The words I live by...

72 posted on 10/15/2004 1:53:36 PM PDT by Ichneumon ("...she might as well have been a space alien." - Bill Clinton, on Hillary, "My Life", p. 182)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: sharkhawk
I read his review of the motorcycle diaries, and he had what might have been the most hilarious or sad lines I have ever read. He basically said that Che and Castro were actually right wingers and not communists, because they suppressed free speech and independent thought.

In a way he's right as well as being wrong. Oppression isn't a liberal trait, but that's where Communists and the Left are, and the Democratic Party for all intents and purposes is there, too.

73 posted on 10/15/2004 2:31:19 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Federal Creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Kornev

Roger Ebert = Michael Moore with a shave.


74 posted on 10/15/2004 3:21:36 PM PDT by valkyrieanne (card-carrying South Park Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: valkyrieanne
ebert interviewed clinton once and did everything but ask him for a date
75 posted on 10/15/2004 4:23:03 PM PDT by Taffini (I like Tony Soprano even though he is a fat boy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Kornev

One star from Ebert? Definitely a 'must-see' for me!


76 posted on 10/15/2004 5:49:47 PM PDT by LayoutGuru2 (Triskaidekaphobia ? Never heard of it !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LayoutGuru2
Ebert, like most liberals, has utterly no sense of humor when it's his side being ridiculed.

We've endured thirty years of shots like Frank Burns, Archie Bunker, and "That's My Bush".

Turnabout is fair play.

77 posted on 10/15/2004 8:13:47 PM PDT by Wormwood (Iä! Iä! Cthulhu fhtagn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Wormwood

"That's My Bush" was a Parker/Stone creation. I actually watched a few episodes out of curiosity. Hard to believe the lefties let this show get canned after only eight episodes.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0268077/


78 posted on 10/15/2004 9:22:13 PM PDT by LayoutGuru2 (Triskaidekaphobia ? Never heard of it !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Wormwood

I saw it today. If you thought the South Park movie was over the top, you ain't seen nothin'. I laughed a lot, and winced a lot too. The speech at the end is really crude, but oh so true if you let it sink in.


79 posted on 10/15/2004 9:30:33 PM PDT by cspackler (There are 10 kinds of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool

This movie Rocks. My YR Chapter went to it tonight and we were DYING!!!

The others in the audience didn't know what they had bought into, and it was heard as we were laughing "That's Not funny!" on several occasions


80 posted on 10/15/2004 11:33:59 PM PDT by SShultz460
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson