Posted on 10/11/2004 8:26:19 AM PDT by jperspective
How these jokers are getting so much of the Jewish vote is beyond logic.
Yet the Jews continue to vote for the 'Rats...
figure that out???
Whatever happened to the vaunted Jewish intelligence?
I never thought I'd have the opportunity to say 'Stupid Jews'!
Ever.
Very good commentary. Thanks.
I asked a Jewish friend who I went to college with why the Jewish vote leaned so heavily towards the Democrats. His answer was instructive.
"Jews cannot support Republicans because they view them mostly as Evangelical Christians who hijacked their Messiah and Torah.
The good and decent people of the world MUST resist this evil.
President Bush MUST be re-elected.
What throws me is that Kerry's answer to everything seems to be censorship. He didn't like the Swift Boat Vets, so he called on President Bush to shut them up. Of course, this would have violated 527 rules and would have been censorship. Then Kerry didn't like the book "Unfit for Command," so he called on the publisher to stop publishing it. Censorship again. And now he's muzzling visitors to his own web site. Censorship once more.
And Democrats claim we're compromising constitutional rights??
Isn't that the truth!
Every Jewish website or publication I find, supports Bush and things like the Right to Bear Arms and conservative values in general, yet the Jewish 'population' seems 100% contrary to that. It's baffling?!?
"Jews cannot support Republicans because they view them mostly as Evangelical Christians who hijacked their Messiah and Torah.
They would rather support Democrats that are mostly anti-Jew, anti-God, and don't believe in the Tora or the Messiah.
Smart.....
This statement is completely wrong. Observant Jews overwhelmingly support Bush as do Jews under the age of 30. The problem is that the majority of non-observant secular Jews don't care about Israel's well being. They are more concerned with liberalism. The old saying is that you cant teach an old dog new tricks. That may be true in this case but some of us are coming around.
Hehehehehe. Yay for network news!
I actually think that Bush will get close to 40% of the Jewish vote. I simply dont believe the polls that show him getting just 25% of the vote. I know tons of Jews who voted for Gore in 2000 who will be voting for Bush this time around.
John Kerry's Discharge - He won't sign Form 180 - What is he hiding?
http://acuf.org/issues/issue21/040929pol.asp
What a young man did more than 30 years ago should not be a primary criteria in determining his qualifications to be President of the United States. George Bush has had almost 4 years now as Commander and Chief of the World"s largest military force and he should be judged on how well he has done. Yet John Kerry and the Democratic left won"t give it up. On almost a daily basis he says I served this country honorably as a young man in Vietnam (4 months/12 days) and I will serve this country honorably as Commander and Chief. Then the Left yells that George Bush got preferential treatment in getting into the National Guard and even failed to complete his guard obligations; even forging documents to prove their point.
The facts are that George Bush served honorably in the National Guard obtaining service points far in excess of the 50 annual service points required to meet his obligation. Records show that in 1968/69 he accumulated 253 points, 340 in 1969/70, 137 in 1970/71, 112 in 1971/72, 56 in 1972/73 and 56 in 1973/74. Points far in excess of the service agreed to and that required to meets his obligation and be Honorably Discharged. George Bush has never made his National Guard service a qualification to lead this country, nor has he ever questioned the service of John Kerry.
While the Left and the mainstream media have never questioned the Vietnam era service of John Kerry, they seem to feel that the record of George Bush 30 years ago should be of concern to voters in November. But what about John Kerry's record? We are told that he was a decorated veteran. We are also told that he was deeply involved in anti-war activities on his return from Vietnam in violation of his oath as an officer in the US Navy. By his own account of his actions and protests, he violated the UCMJ, the Geneva Conventions and the U.S. Code while serving as a Navy officer. Further he met, on two occasions, with North Vietnamese negotiators in 1970 and 1971, while a Reserve Officer, willingly placing himself in violation of Article three, Section three of the U.S. Constitution, which defines treason as "giving aid and comfort" to the enemy in time of warfare.
From here the record of John Kerry becomes unclear and the mainstream press won't demand that John Kerry sign a Department of Defense (DOD) form 180 that would release all of his military records. Records released by his campaign are confusing. There are indications that he was Honorably Discharged on Jan. 3, 1970, Feb 16, 1978, July 13, 1978 and even lately Mar. 12, 2001. Why the confusion on a relatively simple service event. Could it be that John Kerry received a less than honorable discharge in the early 70"s because of his anti-war activities? And then was pardoned for those activities when then President Jimmy Carter on January 21, 1978 ( Proclamation 4483) granted a full, complete and unconditional pardon to all persons who may have committed any offense between August 4, 1964 and March 28, 1973 in violation of the Military Selective Service Act or any rule or regulation promulgated there under.
Did John Kerry request that his service be granted an Honorable Discharge and it was finally granted in 1978? Only a complete release of his military records will show what actually happened during this period. And, to date John Kerry has refused to sign the necessary DOD form 180 which would allow for this release. If the Democratic Party, the media, and the Bush critics are going to demand, as they do on almost a daily basis, that George Bush release all of his records, should they not do the same for John Kerry?
Michael Ashbury is a noted researcher and author, and the author of ''Who is the REAL John Kerry?'' (Booksurge.com 2004). His website is at http://www.whoistherealjohnkerry.com
What I posted was my friend Ben's opinion, and I stated it as such.
The fact that many Jews don't reciprocate the support to Republicans may hurt, but we conservatives will never abandon our support for Israel and our commitment to keep the Jewish people safe from Islamofascists. The phrase "never again" should not be used unless we mean it.
Conservatives should mean it. We are fighting evil--together.
"The problem is that the majority of non-observant secular Jews don't care about Israel's well being."
But to say "They are more concerned with liberalism" is merely to beg the question. Notwithstanding their "non-observance", are they Jews or not? If they identify themselves as Jewish in any meaningful way, then their insistence on voting for the party which welcomes anti-semitism with open arms is infuriating.
I'm here to let you know that many of us very much DO appreciate your support. Those that don't anger and upset me even more then they do you. I think that even the Liberal Jews are coming around to the idea that their support for liberalism is akin to sleeping with the enemy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.