Replies

I never payed Barr that much attention unless he was saying something against Clinton.

So when he's speaking out against Clinton he's credible, but when he's speaking out about Bush, he's not?

No, it's just that I happened to agree with his criticism of Clinton and wasn't discrimatory enough about who was making the criticism.

So when he's speaking out against Clinton he's credible, but when he's speaking out about Bush, he's not?

As sharp as Bob Barr was during Clinton Impeachment, that's how twisted he is in his logic against President Bush.

If he can't understand that the economic bubble burst six months before GWB came into office, if Bob Barr can't see the $200 billion in annual capital gains tax (federal) revenues that were lost due to the halving of the NASDAQ bubble burst - (check it out - a 47 percent decline from its high) in the NASDAQ prior to Bush even taking office, if Bob Barr can't see the priority to upgrade our military after the utter decimation (19 Divisions to 11 divisions) under Clinton, if Bob Barr can't see the negative impact of the economy due to the corporate crimes which Clinton and Rob Rubin literally allowed to take place -- then BOB BARR IS NOT CREDIBLE.

I don't care if he has a 100 percent rating from the NRA, if he is ProLife, if he is a fiscal whatever. He is not playing with a full deck if he is blaming these things on President Bush. End of story.