[MarlboroRed]

This is silly.

Bush will carry men by at least 10 points, and lose women by about 5.

[FesterUSMC]

NOT, I don't believe any of these polls, lets see what happens Nov 2nd

[Cableguy]

Rasmussen had Bush/Gore at 40/48 last time. Until he proves himself, his work is still questionable.

[gov_bean_ counter]

Never try and poll men during the NLCS, ALCS, WS, NCAA anything, Super Bowl, NBA playoffs, NHL playoffs, etc, etc.

[conservativepoet]

You've got to be kidding. I know Bush will win the men's vote by 10-12%. Actually, this observant catch makes me feel better about Bush's support. I'm so glad freepers have a mind of their own.

[Williams]

Keep all your dreams going. The election is in trouble at the moment. Bush is on the verge of losing. And if it happens I put the blame on republican defensiveness. Bush was on the stage with an unreformed lying left wing anti-defense tax and spend kook, in fact the most far left member of the U.S. Senate. And the most Bush said was "I respect his service in the Senate, I don't know if I respect the record." Thanks for playing Gentleman Jim with my family's security.

The most telling comment in this election was from the many republuicans who said of Zell Miller's speech: "We couldn't have said it as republicans!" That says it all.

[Prost1]

The survey was taken in San Francisco.

[jaycost]

Let's do ourselves a favor and just agree to ignore Rasmussen. His poll is lousy. So is Survey USA's polling. The reason for this is that they are done by an automated caller. Respondents do not speak to a real person. This skews results because people are more inclined to hang up. More hang ups mean that the ultimate sample that they take is not respresentative of the national public.

A common sense test of this hypothesis that something smells fishy with Rasmussen can be seen by the fact that his is the only poll whose results have been consistently within the margin of error. In other words, Bush and Kerry each have always ranged from about 44 to 50. In other words, the difference between any given Rasmussen poll with any other given Rasmussen poll can be explained entirely by statistical differences. Rasmussen's poll indicates that there has been no statistically noticeable movement in the electorate in nearly nine months. His is the only poll where this is the case. Anybody believe that?

[Clump]

This is good news for Bush because we KNOW he will get way more than that from men.

[MamaLucci]

It's October........where's our surprise? ;)

[Hermann the Cherusker]

How do we know how men and women really vote? Is there any real evidence for such a large gender gap beyond polls?

[funkywbr]

Well then he better UNWIMP himself before the next debate.

Style does matter in these days of REALITY and MAKEOVER shows.

[JFC]

Bush will win the men and win the women.

BUSH WILL WIN NOVEMBER 2!

[Signalman]

What kind of limp-wristed girle-man would vote for Kerry?
Oh yeah, Democrats.

[LS]

Bush JA rating climbing back up. Rounded to 52% now. Hate to tell Francois, but it is impossible for a sitting president who has a 50+ JA rating to lose an election. Can't happen.