Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saddam had no WMD for a decade, report says
Seattle Times via LA Times ^ | 10/7/04 | Bob Drogin and Greg Miller

Posted on 10/07/2004 5:39:03 AM PDT by foreverfree

snip

WASHINGTON — Saddam Hussein did not produce or possess any weapons of mass destruction for more than a decade before the U.S.-led invasion last year, according to a comprehensive CIA report released yesterday.

Saddam intended to someday reconstitute his illicit programs and rebuild at least some of his weapons if United Nations sanctions were eased and he had the opportunity, the report concluded. But the Iraqi regime had no formal, written strategy to revive the banned programs after sanctions, and no staff or infrastructure in place to do so, the investigators found.

snip


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: wmds
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
FYI

ff

1 posted on 10/07/2004 5:39:04 AM PDT by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: foreverfree

And where did the weapons that we know he had go? Does this report say?


2 posted on 10/07/2004 5:39:49 AM PDT by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foreverfree

I can't find the link yet but there is already a conflicting report to this. I will find it!


3 posted on 10/07/2004 5:41:05 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (Dan Rather, "I lied, but I lied about the truth".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foreverfree

The CIA seems to be actively trying to derail Bush. Why release this 3 weeks before the election?


4 posted on 10/07/2004 5:43:24 AM PDT by motife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foreverfree

Playing hide and seek with the weapons inspectors from 91 to 98 must have just been a figment of my imagination.


5 posted on 10/07/2004 5:45:47 AM PDT by JoeSixPack1 (At 200 mph, you have no friends..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foreverfree
No weapons but if had them and sent them elsewhere we have no idea.

Wow, typical bureaucrat with an agenda.

6 posted on 10/07/2004 5:46:45 AM PDT by OldFriend (It's the soldier, not the reporter who has given US freedom of the press)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foreverfree

Too bad Saddam never let us know he didn't have them (if in fact that is the case). Remember those phone intercepts Colin Powell played at the UN? "Yes, I was able to hide the weapons." "Don't say weapons on the phone!" Or something like that.

Is is possible that Saddam wanted to keep the inspectors out and play hide-and-seek with them (does ANYONE think Saddam cooperated?) so they wouldn't find out that he has NOTHING? The scenario that he wanted to be able to threaten with WMDs, but not actually have an arsenal ready-made, seems plausible. Give enough grudging, half-hearted cooperation and drag things out, so that the sanctions eventually crumble (with a little help from Saddam's well-paid partners in France, etc.) and then the reference strains and plans could be used for a REAL arsenal. If this was Saddam's thinking, I think it almost worked. Didn't France assure him that they would do everything they could in the UN to prevent a US attack?

Worst-case scenario: Saddam miscalculated (by "misunderestimating" Bush) and lost his job. A violent malignancy has been removed, and 25 million people have a chance at something better - if they are willing to fight for it.

I suppose some will disagree, or say it's spin. Certainly no one wants to see the lives of US servicemen and women lost, or worse yet, wasted.

I always thought the war was unpalatable, but the least bad of the alternatives available to us.


7 posted on 10/07/2004 5:48:37 AM PDT by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeSixPack1

Yeah, I don't buy it either. And just what WAS in all those convoys of trucks that went into Syria just before the war started?


8 posted on 10/07/2004 5:49:08 AM PDT by LadyJMayo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cvq3842

PS I still think they're in Syria.


9 posted on 10/07/2004 5:49:47 AM PDT by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer
I'll read the whole thing later. I'm at work.

ff

10 posted on 10/07/2004 5:50:40 AM PDT by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: foreverfree

"Saddam intended to someday reconstitute his illicit programs and rebuild at least some of his weapons..."

Now he kind of won't.


11 posted on 10/07/2004 5:51:47 AM PDT by Mi-kha-el ((There is no Pravda in Izvestiya and no Izvestiya in Pravda.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foreverfree
I'm not so sure about this, but lets say it is true. Then, we need a list of countries and organizations that were "wrong" about WMD...

The Today show told me this morning that the Bush administration was wrong--they repeated that 20 times. That's one: The Bush administration.

The UN issued resolution after resolution about Iraq’s weapons. That's two: The UN.

Funny, the Today Show didn't mention the UN.

12 posted on 10/07/2004 5:53:10 AM PDT by TankerKC (R.I.P. Spc Trevor A. Win'E American Hero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer

Whether or not there were weapons, the blame for this war still falls squarely at the feet of Saddam. What a madman to deceive the world this way. I see it as a ploy for this tyrant to keep control over his people and to keep the world out so he could continue amassing his fortune. The Democrats will start shouting their "Bush lied" mantra with renewed vigor. The Bush team has to emphasize the fact that Saddam lied & that is why we are in Iraq today.

p.s. personally I think there were wmd's in that convoy to Syria before the war, but, hey, what do I know?


13 posted on 10/07/2004 5:54:07 AM PDT by PoplarBluffian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: foreverfree

One thing that strikes me as odd is that this report was able to be prepared and now reported as "fact" by the MSM and the left that the entire country has been searched and there are no WM all the while reporting that Iraq has large areas that are under control by insurgents and terrorists that the coalition is unable to secure or penetrate.


14 posted on 10/07/2004 5:55:43 AM PDT by noexcuses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foreverfree

I guess the sarin and mustard guess that we did find was never there before it was there.


15 posted on 10/07/2004 5:55:54 AM PDT by PigRigger (Send donations to http://www.AdoptAPlatoon.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foreverfree

So will JFKerry be bringing out Scott Ritter as his new ambassador to Iraq?


16 posted on 10/07/2004 5:56:49 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoplarBluffian
Why wouldn't the recon satellites picked up their movement? Several hundred miles is a lot of distance to move things underground.

ff

17 posted on 10/07/2004 5:56:51 AM PDT by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: foreverfree

One of the first things I remember the troops coming across after invading Iraq was a stockpile of protective body suits and gas masks. I can't help but believe that they were ready to use chemicals against our troops. The only question is where are the WMD now!


18 posted on 10/07/2004 5:57:34 AM PDT by Heart of Georgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PigRigger

Everybody misses the point that it was Saddam's obligation, not Bush's, to proove Iraq did not have WMD. He never did. Well, too bad then.


19 posted on 10/07/2004 5:58:20 AM PDT by Mi-kha-el ((There is no Pravda in Izvestiya and no Izvestiya in Pravda.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: foreverfree

Ummm...was this the same CIA that briefed the President and staff before going to war? So which is it? He had them in 2003 or now he doesn't in 2004?


20 posted on 10/07/2004 6:00:51 AM PDT by ProudEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson