Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reporters Saw Bush as Debate Winner, But Swayed by Media Line
Media Research Center ^ | October 6, 2004

Posted on 10/06/2004 11:18:49 PM PDT by kingattax

The power of the media's spin: Newsweek's Evan Thomas and NBC's David Gregory conceded on Imus in the Morning this week that they thought George W. Bush won the debate last week, but changed their mind in the face of the media line. "I was quickly informed I was wrong and that Kerry had won," Thomas quipped Monday morning. Thomas said that while "Kerry did well," he "didn't think that Bush was as terrible as everybody else did." Gregory stated that he "initially" saw Bush as the winner, but then "there was kind of a debate in the press corps, those of us who were watching in the main filing center where we were watching the pool feeds, as opposed to watching some of the other networks that had the reaction shots and the split screens."

The MRC's Jessica Anderson noticed the comments made by phone on the Imus in the Morning radio show simulcast on MSNBC.

On Monday morning, October 4, Thomas, Newsweek's Assistant Managing Editor, revealed: "I thought it was a good debate. I initially thought that it was pretty much of a tie, but I was quickly informed I was wrong and that Kerry had won. You know, maybe I'm used to Bush's peevish side, but it sort of didn't surprise me. You know, I thought Kerry did well, I thought he did himself a lot of good, but I didn't think that Bush was as terrible as everybody else did."

On Tuesday morning, October 5, Imus observed: "I thought he won the debate, by the way -- President Bush." David Gregory, NBC's White House reporter: "I did, initially." Imus, talking over Gregory: "I'm the only person on the planet apparently who did, and my wife." Gregory: "Well, you know, I must say, there was kind of a debate in the press corps, those of us who were watching in the main filing center where we were watching the pool feeds, as opposed to watching some of the other networks that had the reaction shots and the split screens. You know, I saw it as a much, as a much closer debate and then I went back and read the transcript and saw where Bush missed opportunities, which they admit now. You know, I mean, they've sort of come out of denial since last Friday and recognized, after they'd taken quite a bit of flak from Republicans here in town and elsewhere about his performance, that he missed opportunities. It's as if he wasn't listening or had too much information in his head, that he was trying to deploy certain lines at different times, that he missed certain things that Kerry said that he's, you know, now tried to pounce on in the days since."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: firstdebate; gwb2004; mediabias; mrc; presidentbush; presidentialdebates
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: The Old Hoosier

I thought the President was whipped by style but not by substance. He abounded in that. I find it surprising that Gregory had the eyes to see it. Evan Thomas doesn't surprise me because he's more open-minded.


41 posted on 10/07/2004 12:43:48 PM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

We are voting on our Cammander-in-chief........not the best debater........heck, even I can out talk that "kept man" Kerry!


42 posted on 10/07/2004 12:53:06 PM PDT by Doctor Don
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kayak

Lemmings off a cliff. Talk about peer pressure, they're like a group of teenagers, someone might say something that is out of line, and wow, like, no more dinner invitations to Sally Quinn's house. Argh.


43 posted on 10/07/2004 9:31:55 PM PDT by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
If substance meant anything then W won going away. Yaaawn flapped his lips and said nothing. When W gives a decent presentation and good command of the subject than the Mediots will look like fools. They will flex their weakened muscles again though.

Pray for W and Our Troops

44 posted on 10/07/2004 9:34:49 PM PDT by bray (Hey Dingbat, how do you say Tax-Evasion in Portugese???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Bush won hands down on substance. Unfortunetly, the mindless masses cannot think for themselves and a great number actually believe the BS spewed by the DNC shills, aka journalists.


45 posted on 10/07/2004 9:38:38 PM PDT by dougherty (I saw the angel in the marble and carved until I set him free. - Michelangelo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dougherty

unfortunetly = unfortunately


46 posted on 10/07/2004 9:40:31 PM PDT by dougherty (I saw the angel in the marble and carved until I set him free. - Michelangelo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Not just RATS. Good Republicans gave in to worry and handwringing and did real damage by their wailing and gnashing needlessly.

The focus should have been, and hopefully from this point forward will be, to support our man completely and focus on the content of what was said.

Bush did indeed win.


47 posted on 10/07/2004 9:42:33 PM PDT by cyncooper (Have I mentioned lately that I despise the media?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper

the RATS are always in lock step..... they are NEVER

inconvenienced by the truth.


48 posted on 10/07/2004 9:58:09 PM PDT by kingattax (FreeRepublic leads...others follow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

bttt


49 posted on 10/07/2004 9:59:07 PM PDT by nutmeg ("The DemocRATic party...has been hijacked by a confederacy of gangsters..." - Pat Caddell, 11/27/00)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Who won the debate? Well, any of you see any DNC ads exploiting something Dubya said? On the other hand, do the words Global Test mean anything to you?


50 posted on 10/07/2004 10:07:25 PM PDT by McGavin999 (If Kerry can't deal with the "Republican Attack Machine" how is he going to deal with Al Qaeda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Bump.


51 posted on 10/08/2004 6:21:53 AM PDT by EllaMinnow (Dan would RATHER lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Does anyone still harbor any hope that, regardless of the performance, the MSM would admit that a Republican won a debate? Anyone?


52 posted on 10/08/2004 6:24:55 AM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson