Posted on 10/05/2004 9:13:18 PM PDT by ambrose
Heads up: Great post-debate coverage on MSNBC - pundits trashing Edwards...
Are scarborough and Reagan Jr having an affair? What the Hell was Jr doing rubbing his back. Jr. is insidious.
My conservative teach wife is perceptive as well--and she sometimes agrees that maybe the sufferage movement should not have been universally applied!
Homosexuals do make the very REASONABLE point that they're sick of having exclusionary heterosexism shoved in their faces from birth, though childhood via texts, readers, films, TV, into adolescence with peer pressure, family pressure, media, music, school 'traditions' and into the job world, on to legal barriers regarding inheritance and even who has the right to oversee your burial.
Forget the political wackos which exist among any special interest. In general, homosexuals want equality in term of respect, human dignity, decency, a libertarian, a sovereign citizen's attitude from their fellow Americans regardless of sexuality.
Dang, I just posted one, too...........LOL!
TYPICAL. Expected. Repulsive.
I couldn't help staring at his hands all through the debate. They fascinated me and I couldn't take my eyes off them.
I've seen three year old girls with hands that weren't as effeminate and soft and smooth as Edwards' hands. Granted, he doesn't and probably never has done yard work or any manual labor, but those hands really gave me the creeps. Bet his wife's hands aren't as creamy and white and smooth, and manicured as her hubby's. {{{{{shudder}}}}}}
Cheney proved last night that he is eminently qualified to be president. Rice has never held elective office, and she would do well to be Cheney's understudy for eight years. She can be pres in 2016.
There was also slavery when the Constitution was drafted and women could not vote.
If only a man could be president, that would suggest that the vice-president must be, and so must the Speaker of the House. Where do we stop? That would also disqualify all of the president's cabinet members that are female, as they are in the line of succession, so therefore, there technically could not be any female cabinet members.
Would you support a constitutional amendment to allow women to run for the presidency as you seem to believe that this was not the intent of the Founding Fathers? Personally, I think that the "equal protection" clause of the Fourteenth Amendment puts this to rest. Article II also enumerates the requirements for the office and gender is not one of them.
Boy, no kidding. He had the Liar's Blinkathon going double-time!
Joe and the rest of the paleomedia are gullible enough to buy their own spin. Facts be damned!
HORRID MAN
What you said!
Liberace gay.
No. I just know how to use GOOGLE. lol!
I'm sick of having the homosexual lifestyle and homoeroticism shoved down the throat of my teenage kid in school, from the media, on television..........
What other segment of the population that is so small forces their agenda on others the way some in the gay community now do? I do not force my lifestyle on others, nor should others expect me to like it when they force theirs on me.
As for the legal aspects, anyone can create a will and leave what they want to whom they want (except for the fact that a spouse cannot be written out of a will), including burial arrangements.
Marriage is what it is. Fathers do not marry daughters, either. Homosexuals can marry ceremoniously, but it is different to expect a state government elected by the people to sanction it.
More on the MSNBC "Truth Squad" lies here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1236531/posts
So then you must have liked Cheney's decision not to discuss it on TV.
One of my favorite moments in the debate. He made Edwards look 3 inches tall.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.