To: freestyle
What is the answer? Nothing from the administration... nothing from the MSM. Not just on this one story... Any of the links between Iraq and Al-Qaeda. Nothing? What about the Polish troops tracking down some WMD? What about Putin's intelligence that Iraq was planning an attack? etc.. etc... What about it? It's almost as if the CIA, other intelligence agencies, State Department, etc. are conspiring to withhold or minimize (not verified, not reliable, etc.) the information. What if we have a Bush administration that, having been burned by not finding WMD's in Iraq in the past year, is totally paralyzed by these reports and will not give them credence's unless 1000% confirmed?
(/tinfoil hat)
83 posted on
10/04/2004 10:42:12 AM PDT by
CedarDave
(To win Friday night's debate, does President Bush need to get a manicure Friday afternoon?)
To: CedarDave
I kinda think that is it.
You can't report anything in today's climate. You could have pictures, video, documents and audio tape of Sadaam talking to Osama on sept 10th saying "tomorrows the big day"...
...and you'd still have people (even here on FR ;) ) thinking that they were just look-alikes.
I'm voting for Bush, no question... but I was pretty disapointed that at the "foreign policy" debate, he didn't hit Kerry with... umm... FACTS.
Now I'm hoping Cheney will have something for us... but I'm less and less confident.
To: CedarDave
It's almost as if the CIA, other intelligence agencies, State Department, etc. are conspiring to withhold or minimize (not verified, not reliable, etc.) the information. What if we have a Bush administration that, having been burned by not finding WMD's in Iraq in the past year, is totally paralyzed by these reports and will not give them credence's unless 1000% confirmed? You may be closer to the truth than you think.
227 posted on
10/04/2004 8:23:40 PM PDT by
demlosers
(The FreeRepublic Pajama Press!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson