Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I don't understand those here who come off as superior because they agree with the majority that Bush lost. How much intellectual insight does it take to go along with everyone else?

Bush had more meat. Kerry more desert. Most people will vote based on who they think will kill more terrorists, no matter how the polls wiill fluctuate with people thinking "maybe" one way or other til then.

Get a grip. No one thinks Bush is a good talker. He looked pissed off and tired. But look at the numbers--the mass of voters think Bush the better leader. Gee, wonder who they'll vote for for their LEADER--the better leader, maybe?

471 posted on 10/02/2004 3:24:14 PM PDT by Darkwolf377
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies ]


To: Darkwolf377

Bingo!

The old form vs substance argument.

Clearly Kerry had better form.

Clearly Prez Bush was far more substantive.

Once you bite into the seeming substance of Kerry's message, it all melts away. This is much like biting into a chocolate bunny that you though was solid, but was actually only a chocolate shell with a marsh-mellow interior - nothing of substance.


498 posted on 10/02/2004 3:31:04 PM PDT by roaddog727 (The marginal propensity to save is 1 minus the marginal propensity to consume.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 471 | View Replies ]

To: Darkwolf377

I believe Bush won the debate.


662 posted on 10/02/2004 4:43:35 PM PDT by rushmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 471 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson