Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HUGH HEWITT: "Kerry sinking as we speak" (LIVE THREAD)
radio show ^ | 10/01/04 | Hugh Hewitt

Posted on 10/01/2004 3:09:50 PM PDT by Steven W.

Hugh on fire with the correct analysis on last night's debate.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; election; firstdebate; hewitt; hughhewitt; kerry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 281-285 next last
To: LasVegasMac

Kerry on the stump said to be on the offense. Yes he seems to be. He will get cocky and exagger-no I mean lie about something in a moment of self agrandizement. We will be watching.

By the way will someone please tell me if I heard Kerry correctly when on 2 occasions last night he critisized the President for first securing the oil refineries and left nuclear facilities unguarded. I heard him make this reference twice. What NUCLEAR FACILITIES?


181 posted on 10/01/2004 4:35:37 PM PDT by Texas Songwriter (Texas Songwriter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
My daughter (age 30) who resides in Chicago suburb & has registered for the first time, watched her !st debate. Her Father & I have been patiently waiting to see what her feelings were about this election called & said Kerry had better style but sure came off to her & her friends (same age) as being a pretty boy!!! she has been trying to make up her mind & last night did it. She's for Bush!!!! don't think Kerry mopped the floor for everyone---style will just go so far. Denco
182 posted on 10/01/2004 4:35:55 PM PDT by denco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: M-cubed

Also what kerry will bring to the next 2 debates is an even larger vision of grandeur. He's too elitist to realize that humble is the name of the game right now.


183 posted on 10/01/2004 4:36:29 PM PDT by small voice in the wilderness (Quick, act casual. If they sense scorn and ridicule, they'll flee..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
I've said it before .. I'll say it again .. Bush may mess up words .. But at least you know what he is saying
184 posted on 10/01/2004 4:36:38 PM PDT by Mo1 (Why is the MSM calling the Vietnam Vets and POW's a suspected group??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Monti Cello
but he is glib, which got him through last night

This is why people are frustrated with Bush - he failed to take Kerry to task for his glib and superficial treatment of the monumental world responsibilities faced by the presidential office.

It's like the difference between all the dot.com business plans blithely predicting huge sales increases vs. people who actually have been there now how hard it is to run a business.

Kerry should have been reprimanded for his immature and emotional play to sentiment, as if words mean more than deeds.

Bush missed his chance in front of 60m people. Now, we all have to pitch in and make sure the election is framed by Kerry's comments.

185 posted on 10/01/2004 4:36:46 PM PDT by lemura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

Beldar's take on the first debate
Neither candidate screwed up. Kerry needed a Bush screwup, a huge gaffe, to change the dynamics of the race, and it didn't happen. Thus in the big picture, Bush won. That's true regardless of whether you grade Bush with a "B" and Kerry a "B+" or vice versa. Both candidates crossed the finish line standing; and I think that means Bush will win the election, regardless of how you may "score" this debate on "points" and in isolation.

*******
Small pictures and impressions:

I think Sen. Kerry was at his very best tonight — much better than he was in any of the Democratic primary debates, and in the perfect, very formal and isolated-from-humanity environment to show off his strengths to their best advantage. The format was one where the smartest kid in the class gets to show off, with nobody humming "Hail to the Chief" on a kazoo, and with none of the human interactions that make him look so robotic and inhuman.

Probably because of that, his mannerisms that annoy me the most were fairly muted. But they could not be wholly extinguished. Ask yourself this question: Wouldn't it have been a huge home run for John Kerry if he could have gone through this entire debate with the self-discipline never to mention his Vietnam service? To the extent that his combat service is going to favorably influence some subset of the voting public, hasn't he already gotten the full benefit of that history? And yet, there he is — incapable of holding back the impulse to say, again and again, in effect, "Do you know who I am? You realize, don't you, that I served in Vietnam?" I don't know whether it's two percent or ten percent or thirty percent of the "undecided" or "swing" voters, but some percentage of those voters who are currently leaning Bush and might otherwise might have ended their viewing of this debate by saying, "Kerry's not so bad," were shaking their heads at every Vietnam allusion and muttering the word that I think will doom Kerry's chances for election: "Phony."

Dubya was simply himself. What is important — not shocking or surprising, but important — is how different today's Dubya is from the 2000 election version of himself; and of course, the transformation was 9/11. In contrast to the candidate from 2000, this is a guy who has a very clear and consistent picture of what being the President is all about.

He does not have, and never has had — and has looked in the past (e.g., in 2000) at his worst when trying to pretend to have — the Clintonian policy-wonk's command of subpoints and figures and verbal arguments with Roman numeral signposts going from III to III-A to III-A(4)(b)(vii). When he makes successive supporting points, you can always count them on one hand and usually have a digit or two left over. In fact, stylistically, I wish he would have transcended the format — not felt the need to keep talking until the yellow light flashed on — and repeated himself less. (Man, what a contrast that would have been, because when Kerry speaks, you can see behind his eyes how he's doing a mental multitasking to plot how many more points he'll have time to score before the buzzer sounds.)

*******
Final aside: What a difference this debate was from any of the Gore-Bush debates of 2000, and from some of the run-up to this one! Nobody's going to be writing tonight or tomorrow about anybody's audible sighs or invasions of personal space, or about Kerry's tan. The Bush-is-a-chimp crowd are posting gleefully now about "moo-lahs" and "nukular," but that's an exercise of political masturbation for them at this point, a self-pleasing ritual they're bound to engage in that has no connection to the substance of anything that happened beyond the fact that Dubya showed up and spoke aloud for a while.

For everyone else, this was a serious exercise appropriate to a nation at war, a nation from which 9/11 has banished, at moments like these, most of the frivolities that we had the luxury and innocence in which to engage ourselves back in 2000. But I don't think this debate changed any votes that were already strongly intentioned, nor — despite what I think was an optimal performance, as good as Kerry's capable of giving, in the best possible format for him — do I think it is likely to have swayed many genuinely undecided folks in a different direction than they were already leaning.

Posted by Beldar (bledarblogs.com)


186 posted on 10/01/2004 4:37:03 PM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
Yea, like he was so dead on with the Swifties! I can understand how you feel about the debate, but your cynicism sucks!

LLS
187 posted on 10/01/2004 4:38:01 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (kerry... a girlie-man who built his life on a bedrock of lies, and derives his strength from EVIL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak

The average unpolitical voter very likely didn't bother watching last night, at least not entirely. They'll make there judgement on the spin. Fortunately, Kerry talked out of both sides of his mouth as much as expected last night. That, along with all the 'true Kerry crap' like 'global test, nuclear fuel for Iran, the list goes on, should provide plenty to hammer him with.


188 posted on 10/01/2004 4:39:24 PM PDT by Conservative Texan Mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak
Glad to hear that...I have no one to bounce my opinions off of...all my friends and family love Bush...LOL

The one mom was so excited to tell me about all the Bush/Cheney yard signs she was seeing in the burbs outside of Philly *L*

189 posted on 10/01/2004 4:39:36 PM PDT by Mo1 (Why is the MSM calling the Vietnam Vets and POW's a suspected group??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: denco
I'm glad your daughter saw the light.

Now, if only I could get my 74 yr old Mom's light bulb to come on....sigh...

LVM

190 posted on 10/01/2004 4:39:44 PM PDT by LasVegasMac (John Kerry says he has changed his mind about all those NO votes in the Senate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper

" Krauthammer has been wrong before and is wrong this time, too."

CK was adamantly opposed to the Swift Vets, when they first appeared.


191 posted on 10/01/2004 4:40:01 PM PDT by Wild Irish Rogue ( Kerry to our troops-Throw down your arms and surrender !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
Hello,

Well, I survived the suicide watch on FR last night and thought today about the lasting impression of this debate. Here is what I came up with:

BUSH: America is Best
KERRY: Global Test

I am thinking about getting this made into a bumper sticker, as is sums up the differences between the candidates.

Glad to be here, MOgirl
192 posted on 10/01/2004 4:43:11 PM PDT by MOgirl (In memory of Walton Wayne Callahan, I love you forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: woodyinscc

Good point. I think they'll do the ol' good cop-bad cop. Bush, in his quiet, gracious way, will be the good cop. He will compliment Kerry, disagree with Kerry's stance, but mostly talk about all of the successes of his presidency thus far.

Cheney will kick a** and take names. My only concern, not being overly familiar with Edwards (who is?! he's INVISIBLE!), is that Edwards' background as a(nother) lawyer will allow him to slither out from under the truth Cheney will try to hammer home.

On another note, what *lawyer* have we in the US ever elected or run for president that WASN'T a complete tool?


193 posted on 10/01/2004 4:44:01 PM PDT by pcgTheDestroyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Dog

Yes, but stupid people don't know that.


194 posted on 10/01/2004 4:44:32 PM PDT by brooklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Texas Songwriter
on 2 occasions last night he critisized the President for first securing the oil refineries and left nuclear facilities unguarded. I heard him make this reference twice. What NUCLEAR FACILITIES?

Outstanding point.

Here are the Kerry quotes from the debate (I think they're the ones you meant):

"That's exactly where we find ourselves today. There's a sense of American occupation. The only building that was guarded when the troops when into Baghdad was the oil ministry. We didn't guard the nuclear facilities."

[snip]

"When you guard the oil ministry, but you don't guard the nuclear facilities, the message to a lot of people is maybe, 'Wow, maybe they're interested in our oil.'"
195 posted on 10/01/2004 4:45:20 PM PDT by Mike Fieschko ("Did you know I served in the Clone Wars?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper

To play devil's advocate here, I assume that Krauthammer was looking at it from the perspective of how the average viewer who was undecided or open to switching a vote might have seen it -- not necessarily how he saw it.

I find it hard to give an honest assessment of that, to put myself in those shoes, because there is absolutely nothing W could say or do to make me vote for Kerry. I can't even listen to the man, it's like fingernails down a blackboard. So I think I am completely incapable of giving a realistic assessment of that debate.


196 posted on 10/01/2004 4:45:24 PM PDT by JustaCowgirl (Terrorists will "global test" us right off the planet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: M1911A1
I read on another thread that using the clips is verbotten until after the election, due to the debate rules agreed to.

That rule only applies to the DNC and the RNC. An independent 527 group is perfectly within its rights to use those clips.

197 posted on 10/01/2004 4:46:44 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (I made enough money to buy Miami -- but I pissed it away on the Alternative Minimum Tax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: MOgirl

Thanks for the impressions. I think I'll and print those out on a homemade sign to put in the back window of my truck.


198 posted on 10/01/2004 4:47:28 PM PDT by My2Cents (http://www.conservativesforbush.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

This debate will be forgotten by Monday, but "global test" will live larger than Kerry until November 2. Bet on it. Ultimately substance trumps style.


199 posted on 10/01/2004 4:48:08 PM PDT by Clump
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah

Knowing sKerry he MISSED the vote, because he was off getting a manicure.


200 posted on 10/01/2004 4:49:42 PM PDT by GailA ( hanoi john, I'm for the death penalty for terrorist, before I impose a moratorium on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 281-285 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson