Evidently, as you failed to address the question(s) raised.
You question how they can figure out who is the "true" Kerry/Nader worshipper and who is the "FR",,and since there is no answer you think you are making a point?
If I understand that hodgepodge correctly: yes, obviously. The concern you originally adanced was (your own exact words): "Seems to me that any member from the website or any of the DU sites can very easily read this thread and well,,I know they aren't that smart but,,,"
That concern was effectively remedied. It (quite obviously) does not matter whether they see this thread or not. The only way they could effectively block our efforts would be to cease their bogus vote-swapping operations altogether. If this remains in any way unclear to you, I'll happily attempt to explain it once again. :)
You're kidding, right? And, the difference between your type of thinking and the dumb DU type of thinking is.....?
Either you're reasing, or else simply being purposely obdurate. PREVENTING voter fraud is, patently, not the same thing as COMMITTING voter fraud. Please.
Sorry, call me disappointed. I don't respect that kind of thinking. So, I will have to respectfully disagree with you.
Be as disappointed as you like, for whatever reasons best please you. They are, in this instance, demonstrably fallacious ones... but: that's your perogative, certainly.
Your condescending tone is not lost,,congratulations.
You can be as sneaky and fraudulent as you want and misrepresent yourself in whatever way suits you.
Winning at "any cost" is not a value I share. I associate that type of thinking with the 'RATS. I am sure there are a ton of DEM "get out the vote" sites you may want to visit and misrepresent yourself on.
I don't even see the clever value here. But hey, I'm just a pretty simple Texan who doesn't use words like "obdurant." I am soooooo grateful to have an intellectual such as yourself put me in my place because I happen to disagree. You are soooo superior.
HHmmnnn...I like the way you think...
I don't think that jumping in to the same behavior we see from the Dims is a good idea, in general, and is sleazy, at best. I try to live my life in a moral way - I understand about the voter fraud issue and I am VERY concerned about it - I agree with a couple of the posters here, though, this is more a fraud against the Nader voters who will be tricked into voting for Kerry while the Kerry voter will ALSO vote for Kerry - bad, yes, sleazy, yes - count me out. I am glad to stand outside the polls with a video camera for a day, to show my ID when I go vote, if required, and to make sure I am registered ahead of time and that I vote early in the day, if not ahead (Texas allows early voting up to 17 days before the election at convenient locations). What I WILL NOT do is to get into the trenches with them - I will denouce their tactics, I will support investigations, I will call for their removal from the rolls - I WILL NOT sling poo in the same manner as the Dims. No, I'm not naive, I'm just trying to live my life in a moral way. I think Nader voters are throwing away their vote - including some members of my family who are doing so - but better Nader than Kerry. Kerry's loss - in no case are Kerry voters going to vote for Nader, no matter for what they sign up. I'm just not going to sink to their level in an attempt to usurp votes that would otherwise be going to... no - still going to be going to... Kerry. Whether I sign up or not as a Nader voter will NOT change what the Kerry voter does, IMHO - so why sell out my morals for a non-cause? Why sell out my morals, ever? Sorry - not interested.