Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Luis Gonzalez

I agree and I did sort of exempt Rudy from my general rules that if you want to pick a nominee who might win the general:

1. Eliminate the guys and gals who have never won statewide elections in a medium to big state.

2. Eliminate the Senators

Rudy may be a special case. But notice all those here fearing Clinton/Obama are fearing two sitting Senators. The last time a sitting Senator won the White House was 1960, they had to cheat to win that one and the previous time was, I don't know when but certainly before FDR or Hoover. That is unless Kerry wins this time and then Clinton in 08 is not an issue.


150 posted on 09/26/2004 4:42:47 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]


To: JLS
Rudy may be a special case. But notice all those here fearing Clinton/Obama are fearing two sitting Senators. The last time a sitting Senator won the White House was 1960, they had to cheat to win that one and the previous time was, I don't know when but certainly before FDR or Hoover.

The only other sitting Senator ever to win was Harding. And if I may add, I think Obama is a flash in the pan. Every cycle there's some new, unheard of person who makes a splash at one of the conventions, and everyone starts bubbling about his wonderful future. Somehow, it never seems to come true.

You don't win a presidential nomination by giving one good speech at your party's national convention. You win it by hard, dedicated work, building alliances and raising money.

157 posted on 09/26/2004 4:47:56 PM PDT by Brandon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson