Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CBS Nixes '60 Minutes' Story on Iraq War
AP via NYTimes.com ^ | 09/25/2004

Posted on 09/25/2004 8:48:15 AM PDT by GeneD

Filed at 11:17 a.m. ET

NEW YORK (AP) -- CBS News has shelved a ``60 Minutes'' report on the rationale for war in Iraq because it would be ``inappropriate'' to air it so close to the presidential election, the network said on Saturday.

The report on weapons of mass destruction was set to air on Sept. 8 but was put off in favor of a story on President Bush's National Guard service. The Guard story was discredited because it relied on documents impugning Bush's service that were apparently fake.

CBS News spokeswoman Kelli Edwards would not elaborate on why the timing of the Iraq report was considered inappropriate.

The report, with Ed Bradley as the correspondent, has long been in the works. Originally scheduled for June, it was first put off because of new developments, Edwards said.

CBS said no other reports on the presidential election have been affected.

The network last week appointed former U.S. Attorney General Dick Thornburgh and retired Associated Press chief executive Louis Boccardi to investigate what went wrong with the National Guard report and recommend changes.

The controversy has put CBS News officials squarely on the fire line, particularly anchor Dan Rather, who narrated the National Guard report.

Meanwhile, the network announced that Rather would anchor the network's coverage of all three presidential debates, starting Sept. 30.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cbs; iraq; liarrather; liberalsareliars; rather; rathergate; ratherisaliar; ratherlied; viacom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-123 next last
To: Dudoight

Who cares. It's not like we need CBS to tell us that trying to create democracy with a bunch of iraqis is stupid.


101 posted on 09/25/2004 4:32:18 PM PDT by Vis Numar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mhking
The Guard story was discredited because it relied on documents impugning Bush's service that were apparently fake.

Ostensibly and evidently right.

102 posted on 09/25/2004 4:33:21 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul (Kerry's total disregard for the troops' safety is of no consequence to him - Vietnam, and now Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
CBS stock is down 5 days in a row . .


103 posted on 09/25/2004 4:36:19 PM PDT by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: GeneD

Didn't they get their "documents" forged in time?


104 posted on 09/25/2004 4:42:49 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD

According to another more detailed report in The New York Times today, this CBS report was going to recycle the Joe Wilson canard that Bush told a lie (based on forged documents) about Iraq trying to buy yellowcake from Niger, and went to war on this basis. However, The New York Times reporter doesn't point out that Bush's statement referred to British intelligence which was independent of those forged documents, and was later upheld by a British investigation and by a U.S. Senate intelligence investigation. Both of these investigations said that reports of Saddam Hussein trying to obtain yellowcake from Africa were "well founded" - and as a result, Joseph Wilson was discredited.

If CBS had aired this documentary, based on Joseph Wilson's contentions, they would have been even further discredited.

Incidentally, The New York Times reporter says that the Bush Administration later admitted that the content of the forged documents was untrue. The Bush Administration never said it was untrue. They said that the documents that they had in their possession were forgeries but that the British had separate intelligence which they continued to stand by. So The Times is lying as well as CBS. What else is new?


105 posted on 09/25/2004 5:03:09 PM PDT by DianeDePoitiers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe; Grampa Dave; MeekOneGOP; Tamsey; onyx; potlatch; ntnychik; devolve

106 posted on 09/25/2004 5:12:47 PM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo
hahahaaa! :^D

107 posted on 09/25/2004 5:16:50 PM PDT by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo; MeekOneGOP
>> "Hi - I'm Lucy Ramirez!"

Wouldn't put it past her, but she'll never have half the brains/cunning/treachery as our former first lady.

(Wonder who that could be?)

108 posted on 09/25/2004 5:24:20 PM PDT by Happy2BMe (Just 38 more days until November 2nd.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
"Meanwhile, the network announced that Rather would anchor the network's coverage of all three presidential debates, starting Sept. 30."

As if there was really any doubt.

"Rathergate" won't be treated as such within CBS, as Mary Mapes is indeed going to be the fall person for this, regardless of how involved Rather truly was in that story.

Keep the pressure up on the affiliates, is all I can say. Otherwise, Gunga Dan walks away scot free on this one.

109 posted on 09/25/2004 7:22:18 PM PDT by LincolnLover (Say No to Vanities! Posting Help--http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1179671/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
If Dan Blather covered the debates and nobody watched, would he make a sound?

Dan (What's the frequency Kenneth?) is so done.

5.56mm

110 posted on 09/25/2004 7:31:55 PM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Sounds as if "Rathergate" has withered SeeBS.
111 posted on 09/25/2004 7:41:39 PM PDT by fella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Novel

Last nite I e-mailed my local CBS affiliate here in SW Missouri, praising their programming and professionalism over the last 40-odd years I've watched them, and commented on the increasingly vitriolic and personal hatred exhibited by Dan Rather and his ilk toward the Bush family, and stated that regretfully, I could no longer trust ANYTHING from CBS News or 60 Minutes. Therefore, I and my extended family would no longer watch their station during CBS' News and 60 Minutes, and would boycott all advertisers of those programs, both national and local, until Rather and his ilk are terminated, and an apology tendered to President Bush, PUBLICLY. Don't expect to see it, but the affiliates are beginning to make sentiments like this known to the network and some have even canceled carrying those programs. That hits them where it hurts......in the pocketbook, and hopefully more viewers will do the same with their own local stations. Just MHO.


112 posted on 09/25/2004 8:04:43 PM PDT by Southbound ((Formerly a hairy-legged, deprived banjo picker.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dudoight; All

Actually ratings are down I don't know why CBS don't just let Dan Rather GO

I don't get CBS news bunch of old farts got punk by Freeper Buckehead


113 posted on 09/25/2004 8:58:02 PM PDT by SevenofNine ("Not everybody , in it, for truth, justice, and the American way,"=Det Lennie Briscoe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
War in Iraq because it would be ``inappropriate'' (Too Hot to Handle) to air it so close to the presidential election, the network said on Saturday. This probably was another RATHERBIAS report that would have brought even harsher attacks on Danny Boy. Nontheless, this idiot has to go. Let's keep the pressure on CBS NEWS and it's sponsors.
114 posted on 09/25/2004 9:14:54 PM PDT by crushelits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
The story says there was a delay already in June because of "new developments." What "new developments" in the WMD issue could there be, except evidence contradicting the "no WMD's" dogma?

The 9/11 Commission report. They had to figure out how to work around the fact that even that biased group said the Niger/Yellowcake story was never debunked and evidence actually buttresses that intelligence. Oh, they issued the report technically in July, but by June I'm sure media realized this angle was not playing out as they'd like so they had to tweak.

115 posted on 09/25/2004 9:40:28 PM PDT by cyncooper (Have I mentioned lately that I despise the media?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper

"The 9/11 Commission report"

That's right! Thanks. The old Wilson story was very much blown wasn't it. That supports my take on CBS spiking it now. Can't have anything now that might look like it validates GW can we?


116 posted on 09/25/2004 9:45:18 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard (I, the jury)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: DianeDePoitiers

You have summed it up well. That is exactly how Newsweek reported the story was going to air, also, and according to their story (And Newsweek's tone betrayed no concern about this impending "journalistic" approach) CBS was going to revert to the original Wilsonian spin and ignore all recent findings.

I guess CBS realized some viewers might raise an objection or 50 and be able to document the problems with their tall tale.

One interesting sidenote was Newsweek reported that liberal blogger Joshua Michael Marshall was a consultant for CBS. This is breathtaking. I think Marshall is connected to Wilson.


117 posted on 09/25/2004 9:52:04 PM PDT by cyncooper (Have I mentioned lately that I despise the media?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Tamsey

Thanks.

When Koppel with the dead former whining weasel on the top of his head makes a statement like that. You know that their focus groups show a huge loss in the eyes of those who used to watch the NotNews programs on ABCNNBC BS.


118 posted on 09/26/2004 7:38:05 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (When will the ABCNNBC BS lunatic libs stop Rathering to Americans? Answer: NEVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: MeekOneGOP

Before this election Rather will be symbolic to lying to the American people.


119 posted on 09/26/2004 7:52:53 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (When will the ABCNNBC BS lunatic libs stop Rathering to Americans? Answer: NEVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
Yep. We've known that for quite a while now.
Many other folks will finally have figured it out.

120 posted on 09/26/2004 8:18:44 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-123 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson