Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House of Commons says no to US war on Cuba
Labour Net UK ^ | September 21, 2004 | Cuba Solidarity

Posted on 09/24/2004 7:46:17 PM PDT by Ptarmigan

An overwhelming majority of British MPs of all parties, including Prime Minister, Tony Blair, have made written statements declaring that they would not support any military action against Cuba by the United States. They illustrate the gulf between US foreign policy and the views of members of the British House of Commons.

A report issued today, reveals that 79% of MPs, who responded to letters from their constituents on the question of aggressive US policy towards Cuba, stated that not only would they not support US military action, but that they also thought the Bush administration should change its policies towards the island.

The vast majority of the 402 MPs who replied in writing also believed that US foreign policy had caused hardship for 11 million Cubans and damaged the country’s economy.

The survey was conducted in response to the increasingly hostile stance of the Bush administration towards the island. In the run up to November’s presidential elections, Bush and senior members of his administration have been courting the anti-Castro Cuban-American voters in the key election state of Florida.”

Peter Hain, Leader of the Commons, in a letter to one constituent stated: “I am absolutely opposed to military action being taken against Cuba and also opposed to the continuing blockade of Cuba by the United States. I visited Cuba two years ago and was very impressed with the social advances that have been made despite all the pressure from the US.”

Cuba Solidarity Campaign Director Rob Miller said today: “The responses that we have from a majority of British MPs send a clear message to President Bush that military aggression towards Cuba is one US foreign policy issue that Britain would not support.

“With the backing of these responses we are asking Tony Blair to send the Bush administration a clear message that Britain does not support its policy on Cuba, and to work to foster better relations between Cuba and Britain at this dangerous time.”

ends


TOPICS: Cuba; Foreign Affairs; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: communism; cuba; fidelcastro; houseofcommons; loonyleft; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 last
To: Nevermore

That is because all Castro does is call the embargo a blockade. He always uses the term "bloqueo". He wants the image that the US is surrounding the island with warships blocking the island. Of course, Cuba can trade with any damn country in the world it wishes and it is still a crap hole. Heck, they even buy from US companies but it cannot be on credit it has to be by cash, I think.


81 posted on 09/24/2004 9:17:31 PM PDT by David1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor

If there is a draft, I'd be glad too fight in Cuba and Sudan.


82 posted on 09/24/2004 9:17:42 PM PDT by Ptarmigan (Proud rabbit hater and killer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Ptarmigan

Why these Limeys' opinion of U.S. foreign policy with regard to Cuba is important to us...? Is it that we may need their help? Why were they asked to give their opinion?

They just need to hang tough with us in Iraq.


83 posted on 09/24/2004 9:24:22 PM PDT by Blue Collar Christian (Drivers of SUVs without brush scratches should be horsewhipped! ><BCC>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gary - Peters

Quite a while, potentially. He is still VERY articulate, apparently clear-headed, and has access to literally the very best health care in the world. I have read that he may have had experimental stem-cell injections in switzerland as well.

We could have him around 10 more years easily.


84 posted on 09/24/2004 9:24:38 PM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ptarmigan
What about Newfoundland ? Did they have anything to say about invading Newfoundland ? Why wasn't Newfoundland discussed ? What do they have on Newfoundland ?? Why would they want to let the US invade Newfoundland ? What has Newfoundland done to anger the British MP's ? Why would they allow innocent people in Newfoundland to be killed ? Wheres the compassion for Newfoundlands citizens in the United Kingdom ?

Stay Safe.......Y

85 posted on 09/24/2004 9:25:37 PM PDT by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ptarmigan

A report issued today, reveals that 79% of MPs, who responded to letters from their constituents on the question of aggressive US policy towards Cuba, stated that not only would they not support US military action, but that they also thought the Bush administration should change its policies towards the island.
****
The flouride challenged Brits should change their policy with N. Ireland.

The MP's can stick it.


86 posted on 09/24/2004 9:26:10 PM PDT by Finalapproach29er ({about the news media} "We'll tell you any sh** you want hear" : Howard Beale --> NETWORK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
You picked the same comment I did:

"The vast majority of the 402 MPs who replied in writing also believed that US foreign policy had caused hardship for 11 million Cubans and damaged the country’s economy."

Ah, I believe the US is the only country that does not trade with Cuba. Canada, Mexico and Europe certainly trade with Cuba. Is the American economy so important that it hurts Cuba inspite of trade with the rest of the world?

No, Castro would really be hurt, if the embargo were to be ended, that would take away his last excuse. Communism has caused devastation wherever it was tried. That's the root cause of hardship for Cubans. When Castro took over, Cuba had the second highest standard of living of all the Latin American countries, only Argentina was higher. Today, Cuba has the second lowest standard of living, only Haiti is lower.

87 posted on 09/24/2004 10:01:19 PM PDT by Jabba the Nutt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Ptarmigan; freedom44

commies for commies.


88 posted on 09/24/2004 10:56:38 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ptarmigan; freedom44

AND/OR

dummies for commies.


89 posted on 09/24/2004 10:57:46 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Ptarmigan
Damn, take a nap, miss the war. Sheesh can't get any sleep anymore.
90 posted on 09/24/2004 10:58:56 PM PDT by snooker (French Fried Flip Flopper still Flouncing, be careful out there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ptarmigan

Ok, we'll back of on our war against Cuba if the British will back off on their war against Iceland. What are these people talking about? Cuba is a gnat we have to swat once in a while, but otherwise Castro isn't even worth the time of day.


91 posted on 09/24/2004 11:00:20 PM PDT by Casloy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife; nuconvert; Pan_Yans Wife; The Bronze Titan; MonroeDNA; MattinNJ; Luis Gonzalez

No need for an invasion of Cuba, because Castro will eventually fall, even if Raul takes control of the communist regime it won't last.

The Cubans are some of the most progressively hard-working, intellectual, and advanced individuals on earth.

My best friend of many years was Cuban as was my ex-girlfriend, both of which were working hard at freeing Cuba and helping me promote a progressive pro-US Persian nation in Iran.

In Texas, the Solicitar General is conservative Ted Cruz, Son of Cuban Immigrants he was graduated summa cum laude at Harvard Law School.

Just a "taste" of what Cubans have added to our nation.




92 posted on 09/24/2004 11:09:53 PM PDT by freedom44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Ptarmigan

Time for another "Splendid little war?" - Theodore Roosevelt.


93 posted on 09/25/2004 4:48:01 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson