Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

N Korea threatens to turn Japan into 'nuclear sea of fire'
Japan Today ^

Posted on 09/24/2004 2:16:05 AM PDT by BigDoom

Friday, September 24, 2004 at 07:16 JST

SEOUL — North Korea threatened Thursday to turn Japan into a "nuclear sea of fire" if the United States attacks it with nuclear weapons, South Korea's Yonhap News Agency reported, quoting a North Korean newspaper report.

Rodong Sinmun, the newspaper of North Korea's Workers Party of Korea, said U.S. military bases in Japan would come under its attack in the event of a nuclear war.

"If the United States ignites a nuclear war, the U.S. military bases in Japan would serve as a detonating fuse to turn Japan into a nuclear sea of fire," the paper said in an article, according to Yonhap. .......... (snip)


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: axisofeavil; kim; korea; napalminthemorning; nknukes; northkorea; nuke; nukes; seaoffire; un; usa; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-150 next last
To: BigDoom

Japan can thank America's first black president if they become incinerated.


81 posted on 09/24/2004 11:36:20 AM PDT by JesseHousman (Execute Mumia Abu-Jamal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaughterofEve

Good answer, Daughter! from Momxxx


82 posted on 09/24/2004 11:37:31 AM PDT by Marysecretary (GOD is STILL in control, even if Bush loses in 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: familyop
....N. Korea has made that same threat before, against Seoul. It's nothing new.

That's why we should take them seriously and, unfortunately for those who do not revere their stupid leader, incinerate N. Korea.

83 posted on 09/24/2004 11:39:33 AM PDT by JesseHousman (Execute Mumia Abu-Jamal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian

I'm not prepared to accept this view as doctrine. It won't be long before there are a preponderance of countries that have nukes.

They'll use our doctrine of not attacking a nuclear armed foe against us by threatening one of their neighbors with overwhelming conventional force, then defy us to do something about it.

Ballistic missile defense is something we have to do at this point, and we are.

I think that our future strategic defense policy has to assume that the foe WILL be nuclear capable, and devise their plans accordingly.


84 posted on 09/24/2004 11:41:15 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs (War is the remedy our enemies have chosen. And I say let us give them all they want)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The Duke
That said, I suspect we do not need to attack North Korea, but merely to stop sending them food.

Now that, I agree with.

85 posted on 09/24/2004 11:46:19 AM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian (We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
You could also mount MIRACL systems on warships near Japan where they could protect the fleet and provide an anti-ICBM capability for strategic land launches. The strange official silence about the MIRACL program since its successful test against a missile in flight in 1996 is very provocative. I think it went into production under black budget but it'll be a while before we find out.

Good point. At this point, we (civilians outside the Pentagon) just don't know -- but a comforting thought, if true.

86 posted on 09/24/2004 11:48:31 AM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian (We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: BigDoom

Oh. The ol' "you slap me, I'll slap him" deal. Well, one Kim Il best be careful about who he "slaps" at.


87 posted on 09/24/2004 11:55:43 AM PDT by azhenfud ("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian

I have no idea how I managed to replace "good" with "could"... Sorry...


88 posted on 09/24/2004 1:10:36 PM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #89 Removed by Moderator

To: carl in alaska

I have read that NK has mostly outdated artillery pieces, 25 MiGs and older issue AK's, T-34/54/55/62 tanks the newest of them dating back to the '60s. The soviets supposedly sold them an entire WWII-ear artillery production factory that is actually still in operation today! Not much upgrading since the '80s. A modernized SK military could probably defeat them without our assistance.


90 posted on 09/24/2004 1:28:01 PM PDT by BombHollywood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian

Atomic Weapons and the Means to deliver them are the international, universal Ace Card.

The Means may be the key if we have to. We can park a couple of attack subs 100 miles off shore (and I'll bet there are a couple there right now). How owuld they know they are coming? I can't imagine they have the same "net" we do or that USSR had, but I don't know.
Like a cancer, we have to make sure to get it all.

Oh, shucks! I forgot Bill CLinton was once President. They probably have anything they ever wanted.


91 posted on 09/24/2004 1:34:26 PM PDT by jgophel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dsc

Japan should probably consider putting the technology they have into action building number of nuclear bombs deliverable by balistic or cruise missiles. They need their own deterrent I think


92 posted on 09/24/2004 1:44:05 PM PDT by dimk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: The Duke

Amen, brother. Have a list of a dozen we need to quit feeding.


93 posted on 09/24/2004 1:50:43 PM PDT by Hi Heels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: sandyeggo

94 posted on 09/24/2004 1:53:53 PM PDT by CJ Wolf (And it burns burns burns, like a sea of fire, like a sea of fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: BigDoom
"we don't have any conventional weapon to target a deeply buried shelter in Mountains"

We can't match NK's "river-damming" technological abilities with our conventional weapons?

(did you see the article I'm referring to?)

95 posted on 09/24/2004 2:01:24 PM PDT by Nova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BigDoom

No doubt that we need to take out that little freak of nature, Kim Jung Il -- and a few of his kim jung ilk!

A little lunatic like that is a bigger danger than most realize. The only reason there are so many parades in his honor is that the NKs are too stupid, brainwashed and scared to refuse.

Only the liberals would get upset if we undertook a clandestine assassination -- which is how I gauge when an action is good. They hate it - it MUST be good - let it be done!


96 posted on 09/24/2004 2:03:37 PM PDT by Don Simmons (Annoy a liberal: Work hard; Prosper; Be Happy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kb2614

I think you mean "Godzirra".


97 posted on 09/24/2004 2:04:51 PM PDT by Don Simmons (Annoy a liberal: Work hard; Prosper; Be Happy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BombHollywood

SK probably wouldn't have much trouble defeating NK's outdated armed forces. The problem is the massive civilian casualties and economic destruction that would be caused by an NK artillery attack on Seoul. In just a couple of days, NK artillery could inflict enormous damage on SK. This is KJL's ace in the hole that keeps him in power. But you never know, some day we may invent a way to shut down his artillery in 10-15 minutes and then he'll have to do what we tell him or be gone.


98 posted on 09/24/2004 2:06:38 PM PDT by carl in alaska (Throw deep........you're already in the fourth quarter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: BigDoom

LETS MAKE KIM JONG IL A MARTYR !

LETS KILL THIS FOTHER MUCKER !


99 posted on 09/24/2004 2:18:35 PM PDT by LOSERLIBERALS (KERRY WAS FOR THE WAR BEFORE HE WAS AGAINST IT !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe
Look for Japan to become a major developer of anti-missile technology and/or partner with the U.S. in perfecting it. And something I've been predicting for some time may come true soon -- that the Japanese constitution will be revised to allow for a more proactive military presence in the world.

Back during the Cold War I used to think that rearming Japan would be a good idea (I mean, we rearmed Germany, didn't we?). But over the years I've come to have one problem with it. Unlike Germany, Japan has never come completely clean about their World War II era record. I don't think the Japanese are inherently cruel or ihuman--in fact, in the "1870's" they adopted a humanitarian code for treating prisoners-of-war and in World War I they were indeed humane to their German prisoners. But if they rearm without facing their past with total honesty, will it reawaken the World War II-era ideology? No, it wasn't Communism, but it was a Very Bad Thing.

I'm all for Japan rearming if we can be sure they won't go rogue. But if we can't then I'm not so sure about it--especially since there are still groups in Japan espousing the old WWII ideology and that, as "people of color," they don't attract the ire of the "politically correct" crowd in the same way that German neo-Nazis do.

100 posted on 09/24/2004 2:22:24 PM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (Ki kol 'elohei-ha`ammim 'elilim . . . veHaShem Shamayim `asah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-150 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson