To: ConservativeMan55
The Republicans have cited his mental instability. Why embrace him now?
32 posted on
09/23/2004 7:25:19 PM PDT by
pfflier
To: pfflier
The Republicans have cited his mental instability. Why embrace him now? Well, Gunga Dan says Burkett's "unimpeachable", so we're just taking the SeeBS star at his word...
To: pfflier
<<
Why embrace him now?
>>
It's not so much of an embrace as it is one hand holding ones stomach (laughing), while the other hand pats this dude on the back, (whispering "keep it up dude").
To: pfflier
> The Republicans have cited his mental
> instability. Why embrace him now?
His unsupported statements may only have entertainment value.
But if he has evidence to substantiate them, new ball game.
To: pfflier
"The Republicans have cited his mental instability. Why embrace him now?"
Why, well, "News You Can Trust" Dan Rather, swore he was an unimpeachable source. If he is good enough for Dan, he is good enough for me.
271 posted on
09/23/2004 7:58:03 PM PDT by
Ursus arctos horribilis
("It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!" Emiliano Zapata 1879-1919)
To: pfflier
The Republicans have cited his mental instability. Why embrace him now? We have to. He's CBS' and Rather's "unimpeachable source".
346 posted on
09/23/2004 8:18:11 PM PDT by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(CBS's story is sinking faster than Uncle Ted's Oldsmobile.)
To: pfflier
Why embrace him now? Because he is an unimpeachable source.
398 posted on
09/23/2004 8:35:20 PM PDT by
Mike Darancette
(Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson