Why thank you.
No doubt I'd look MUCH better in a burka
than today's latest in Judeo-Christian fashions
for young ladies.
Posted on 09/21/2004 8:24:29 PM PDT by GIJoel
Posted by dennisw to Askel5
On News/Activism ^ 09/23/2004 12:05:30 PM PDT · 578 of 579 ^You would look great in a burqa, you mind is already dressed up in one. Be sure to bow deep to your Moloch god named Allah
I'd planned on just going ahead and lobbing in a response I was hopeful to pare down before posting yesterday (though today's a little too busy for a full lunch hour) as well as respond to your last.
But first, having noted your pinglist and Dennisw's response, I'd like your answer to two questions before I continue this exchange with You:
(1) For what reason did you ping dennisw, et al. to your reply?
(2) Assuming they are posters who have your respect, do you share the tone and substance of Dennis's opinion as expressed above?
____________________________________
I can't answer for marmema, and I frequently disagree with dennis but here, in this instance, I do. You and schwartz are delusional.
=== I frequently disagree with dennis but here, in this instance, I do.
If you can explain for me the moral justification for mowing down unarmed civilians -- subhuman Palestinians or angry young white American "commie" chicks -- please do so.
Until then, I find it (not so) hard to believe that the New "Pre-emptive" sorts of "Judeo-Christian" philosophies underpinning our new powers of political assassination and morphing such gruesome and wholly gratuitous amassing of Collateral Damage into Laugh Lines always good for a chuckle from fellow Godfearing Conservatives inherently despicable.
Do you even know what the differences are between fascism and communism?
I don't think you do.
See ya!
Wow! Not many women could look good, much less great, in a burqa. Congratulations!!
__________________________________
Are you feeling put upon?
No doubt I'd look MUCH better in a burka
than today's latest in Judeo-Christian fashions
for young ladies.
=== Are you feeling put upon?
No. Is that a problem?
Zapatero isn't OPENLY communist, and I don't think the Spanish communist Party has completely figured him out yet.
I'm hoping that at worst he's an Eurosocialist.
Time will tell I guess.
RE: your post #574
Wow...thanks.
This issue is certainly creating strange bedfellows.
LOL! Is that Britney's idea of fashion? How incredibly vulgar. Of course, a certain deacon thinks she's "hot", so "vulgar" is just one man's opinion.
Actually I do quite well, as I'm rather well read, but thanks for answering your own question, I'm sure you were aiming to freep yourself not me.
Then why do you constantly confuse the two?
Americans also would prefer order over chaos of Yeltsin years. BTW, could you give me the examples of freedoms Americans enjoy and Russians do not have? I want to get an idea what do you mean by the "American type freedom".
Do you close your eyes at the beach? I don't miss the days of people being forced to wear long johns to go swimming.
I don't confuse anything. By your opinion communist governments don't fold up and just leave, but facists do? Hahah, if I applied your logic that you apply to Russia, then the facists are still in power in Spain. But wait, you have the convinence of double standards, how silly of me.
I specifically directed my comment at communism, I can't help your faulty understanding, and your expanding what I said in order to make a point other than the one I was making.
If I say that motorcycles are dangerous, and you start discussing the safety issues of SUV's, we're not discussing the same issue, in spite of the fact that both have engines, both drive down the street, and both are dangerous.
What you did, was engage on one of the most common logical fallacies of all, called a "red herring".
How fitting.
Only if you could convince anyone that communism and fascism are the same thing.
Which you can't, so you continue to expose yourself as a complete _____.
As for that oxygen thief chick from Washington, if she was to stupid to get out of the way of a large piece of earth moving equipment, she's a Darwin Award nominee.Ain't it da troot ... I think we can add this idiot Chicom (and his fellow longpigs slaughtered in the Square), Czechs who thought to throw stones at Soviet tanks and the Branch Davidians to this Darwin Award List of yours.
It's about time we started supporting bankrolled, heavy-armoured WINNERS instead of the steamrolled, unarmed Losers of this world.
I'd rather have the scantly clad girls then the burque wearing heads of cattle.
YOU ARE IN LUCK, BABY!!!
Given the fact this nation's highest court in the land finds faked-cyber child porn to be a part of our and Larry "Free Speech" Flynt's Godgiven rights to express ourselves, I doubt you're going to run into a dearth of scantily clad Christian wimmen anytime soon.
(And may I commend you on your use of "girls" ... most manly men these days are a little skittish about admitting the mainstreaming of Lolita in light of the framing of men as habitual sex fiends and rapists from whom even their own children -- much less the American Beauties their neighbors have bred -- aren't safe.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.