To: GoLightly
They wanted the scoop & knew a couple of other outlets had been sent the same docs. Oh yeah, I forgot that the WH gave copies of the memos to all the pool reporters. Scoop is gone at that point. Have to wonder though, why did USA TOday get a package of 6 documents the day after CBS aired the story? Belf and suspenders in case CBS had chickened out?
209 posted on
09/18/2004 10:39:56 PM PDT by
Cboldt
To: Cboldt
Oh yeah, I forgot that the WH gave copies of the memos to all the pool reporters. Scoop is gone at that point. Come to think of it, THAT does sound like a dirty trick by the Waskily Wepubwecans. Makes me proud.
216 posted on
09/18/2004 10:47:44 PM PDT by
js1138
(Speedy architect of perfect labyrinths.)
To: Cboldt
Have to wonder though, why did USA TOday get a package of 6 documents the day after CBS aired the story? Based on their description of the source, they almost certainly got them from Burkett. And it appears they knew enough about him to be leery. Recall that their first story was very neutral -- it was about the challenges more than the documents themselves.
If USA TODAY knew enough about Burkett to keep him at arm's length, it's one more compelling reason why Rather's "unimpeachable source" had to be somebody else.
242 posted on
09/18/2004 11:28:49 PM PDT by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
To: Cboldt
USAT says they got them from an "independent" source, rather than the WH. CBS runs with the "best" 4, rather than the entire package. The plot thickens.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson